From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [patch nacked? 3/4] Update smc91x driver with ARM Versatile board info Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:41:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20080730234136.GC12409@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <200807301940.m6UJemPm012683@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <20080730224255.GB12409@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20080730160858.74053884.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsaxena@plexity.net, nico@cam.org To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:34873 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762309AbYG3Xmq (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:42:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080730160858.74053884.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 04:08:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:42:55 +0100 > Russell King wrote: > > > Are you aware that smc91x.h _already_ contains a CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE > > section? > > > > Are you aware that I don't maintain arm, net drivers or smc91x.h? > > Are you aware that smartarse rhetorical questions are exceedingly > irritating? Sigh. That's a fucking annoying response to my perfectly legitimate question. Screw you. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: