From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsaxena@plexity.net,
nico@cam.org
Subject: Re: [patch nacked? 3/4] Update smc91x driver with ARM Versatile board info
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:15:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080731081501.GD12409@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080730165114.3c3b0fb5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 04:51:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:41:36 +0100
> Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 04:08:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:42:55 +0100
> > > Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Are you aware that smc91x.h _already_ contains a CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE
> > > > section?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Are you aware that I don't maintain arm, net drivers or smc91x.h?
> > >
> > > Are you aware that smartarse rhetorical questions are exceedingly
> > > irritating?
> >
> > Sigh. That's a fucking annoying response to my perfectly legitimate
> > question.
> >
>
> That is a fake response. You have no possible interest in what I or
> Deepak are or are not aware of. You just chose it as an opportunity
> to be snooty, arrgoant and condescending.
You're the one being extremely stupid here. I've said why I asked the
question, you won't accept that, so there's no point discussing it
anymore.
So I've nothing more to add here. Do what you want with the patch. I
don't care.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-31 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-30 19:40 [patch nacked? 3/4] Update smc91x driver with ARM Versatile board info akpm
2008-07-30 22:42 ` Russell King
2008-07-30 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-30 23:41 ` Russell King
2008-07-30 23:51 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-31 8:15 ` Russell King [this message]
2008-07-31 10:16 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080731081501.GD12409@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dsaxena@plexity.net \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).