pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[John W. Linville]

Dave,

Another big round of fixes for 2.6.27.  Included is also a renaming
patch and some related patches that rename iwl4965 to iwlagn (reflecting
that is supports iwl5000 as well).

The other big(ger) thing here is the new ath9k driver.  It is probably
still far from perfect, but I'm hearing good reports on its
functionality and the Atheros team (and others) have already been quite
responsive on comments, etc.  I think it is best to go ahead and get it
into 2.6.27.

Please let me know if there are problems!

Thanks,

John

---

Individual patches are available here:

	http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/linville/wireless-2.6/

---

The following changes since commit adf044c8778de98dae29c5ce9973b7e43964674f:
  Sven Wegener (1):
        net: Add missing extra2 parameter for ip_default_ttl sysctl

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git master

Daniel Drake (1):
      mac80211: automatic IBSS channel selection

Denis V. Lunev (1):
      iwlwifi: RS small compile warnings without CONFIG_IWLWIFI_DEBUG

Emmanuel Grumbach (3):
      mac80211: pass dtim_period to low level driver
      iwlwifi: bug fix in AGG flow - cast const to ULL
      iwlwifi: decrement rx skb counter in scan abort handler

Esti Kummer (2):
      iwlwifi: corrects power_level in sysfs
      iwlwifi: set led register in disassociation

Gregory Greenman (1):
      iwlwifi: memory allocation optimization

Ivo van Doorn (1):
      rt2x00: Disable link tuning in rt2500usb

Larry Finger (1):
      p54: Fix potential concurrent access to private data

Luis R. Rodriguez (4):
      list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init()
      list.h: add list_cut_position()
      ath5k: remove Atheros 11n devices from supported list
      ath9k: Add new Atheros IEEE 802.11n driver

Mohamed Abbas (1):
      iwlwifi: add power save to 5000 HW

Sven Wegener (1):
      iwlwifi: Don't use buffer allocated on the stack for led names

Tomas Winkler (14):
      mac80211: make listen_interval be limited by low level driver
      iwlwifi: move iwl4965_mac_ampdu_action to iwl4965-base.c
      iwlwifi: move beacon handling to iwl4965-base.c
      iwlwifi: move iwl4965_set_pwr_src to iwl4965-base.c
      iwlwifi: rename iwl-4695-rs to iwl-agn-rs
      iwlwifi: kill iwl4965_fill_rs_info
      iwlwifi: use dtim_period from association, and set listen_interval
      iwlwifi: rename iwl4965-base.c to iwl-agn.c
      iwlwifi: fix checkpatch.pl errors
      iwlwifi: rename 4965 to AGN
      iwlwifi: HW bug fixes
      iwlwifi: implement iwl5000_calc_rssi
      iwlwifi: fix unhandled interrupt when HW rfkill is on
      iwlwifi: grap nic access before accessing periphery registers

Zhu Yi (1):
      iwl3945: fix merge mistake for packet injection

 MAINTAINERS                                        |    9 +
 drivers/net/wireless/Kconfig                       |    1 +
 drivers/net/wireless/Makefile                      |    1 +
 drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c                  |    2 -
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/Kconfig                 |    8 +
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/Makefile                |   11 +
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/ath9k.h                 | 1066 +++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/beacon.c                |  977 +++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/core.c                  | 1961 +++++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/core.h                  | 1097 +++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/hw.c                    | 8563 ++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/hw.h                    |  969 +++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/initvals.h              | 3146 +++++++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/main.c                  | 1533 ++++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/phy.c                   |  436 +
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/phy.h                   |  543 ++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/rc.c                    | 2126 +++++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/rc.h                    |  316 +
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/recv.c                  | 1318 +++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/reg.h                   | 1385 ++++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/regd.c                  | 1031 +++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/regd.h                  |  412 +
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/regd_common.h           | 1915 +++++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/xmit.c                  | 2870 +++++++
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/Kconfig               |   98 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/Makefile              |   13 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-led.c        |   33 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-led.h        |    1 +
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c            |    7 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-4965.c            |  156 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-5000.c            |   71 +-
 .../iwlwifi/{iwl-4965-rs.c => iwl-agn-rs.c}        |  327 +-
 .../iwlwifi/{iwl-4965-rs.h => iwl-agn-rs.h}        |   23 +-
 .../wireless/iwlwifi/{iwl4965-base.c => iwl-agn.c} |  232 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-commands.h        |   44 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c            |    7 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h            |    3 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-csr.h             |   10 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-debug.h           |    4 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-debugfs.c         |   11 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-dev.h             |   22 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom.c          |    3 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-hcmd.c            |    2 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-led.c             |   69 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-led.h             |    1 +
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-power.c           |   45 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-power.h           |   33 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-prph.h            |   12 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c              |   59 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c            |    1 +
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c             |    4 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c              |   78 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c        |   58 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54.h                     |    1 +
 drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.c               |    6 +
 drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2500usb.c            |   14 +
 include/linux/ieee80211.h                          |   13 +
 include/linux/list.h                               |   77 +-
 include/net/mac80211.h                             |   13 +-
 net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h                         |    1 +
 net/mac80211/main.c                                |    5 +
 net/mac80211/mlme.c                                |   39 +-
 62 files changed, 32565 insertions(+), 727 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/Kconfig
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/ath9k.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/beacon.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/core.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/core.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/hw.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/hw.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/initvals.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/main.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/phy.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/phy.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/rc.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/rc.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/recv.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/reg.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/regd.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/regd.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/regd_common.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/xmit.c
 rename drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/{iwl-4965-rs.c => iwl-agn-rs.c} (89%)
 rename drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/{iwl-4965-rs.h => iwl-agn-rs.h} (93%)
 rename drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/{iwl4965-base.c => iwl-agn.c} (96%)

Omnibus patch is available here:

	http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/linville/wireless-2.6-2008-08-04.patch.bz2

-- 
John W. Linville
linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[Marcel Holtmann]

Hi John,

> Luis R. Rodriguez (4):
>       list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init()
>       list.h: add list_cut_position()

have these two changes got reviewed on LKML? I don't see any ACKs for it
in the commit message.

Regards

Marcel

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[John W. Linville]

On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 10:38:08PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> > Luis R. Rodriguez (4):
> >       list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init()
> >       list.h: add list_cut_position()
> 
> have these two changes got reviewed on LKML? I don't see any ACKs for it
> in the commit message.

Hmmm...no.  I thought the original patches had been copied to
linux-kernel, but it looks like that is not the case.

The original patches are archived here:

	http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783421908441&w=2

	http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783422008445&w=2

What problems do you see with them?

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[Marcel Holtmann]

Hi John,

> > > Luis R. Rodriguez (4):
> > >       list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init()
> > >       list.h: add list_cut_position()
> > 
> > have these two changes got reviewed on LKML? I don't see any ACKs for it
> > in the commit message.
> 
> Hmmm...no.  I thought the original patches had been copied to
> linux-kernel, but it looks like that is not the case.
> 
> The original patches are archived here:
> 
> 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783421908441&w=2
> 
> 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783422008445&w=2
> 
> What problems do you see with them?

I don't see a problem with these patches, but they should at least be
reviewed on LKML once. Changes to core kernel infrastructure should not
be merged silently via subsystem trees without any kind of ACKs.

Regards

Marcel

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[John W. Linville]

On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:42:03PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:

> > > > Luis R. Rodriguez (4):
> > > >       list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init()
> > > >       list.h: add list_cut_position()
> > > 
> > > have these two changes got reviewed on LKML? I don't see any ACKs for it
> > > in the commit message.
> > 
> > Hmmm...no.  I thought the original patches had been copied to
> > linux-kernel, but it looks like that is not the case.
> > 
> > The original patches are archived here:
> > 
> > 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783421908441&w=2
> > 
> > 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783422008445&w=2
> > 
> > What problems do you see with them?
> 
> I don't see a problem with these patches, but they should at least be
> reviewed on LKML once. Changes to core kernel infrastructure should not
> be merged silently via subsystem trees without any kind of ACKs.

Yes, fine.  That wasn't my intent. :-)  The patches were originally
posted about two weeks ago, too bad that didn't actually go to
linux-kernel. :-(

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[David Miller]

From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel-kz+m5ild9QBg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:42:03 +0200

> Hi John,
> 
> > > > Luis R. Rodriguez (4):
> > > >       list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init()
> > > >       list.h: add list_cut_position()
> > > 
> > > have these two changes got reviewed on LKML? I don't see any ACKs for it
> > > in the commit message.
> > 
> > Hmmm...no.  I thought the original patches had been copied to
> > linux-kernel, but it looks like that is not the case.
> > 
> > The original patches are archived here:
> > 
> > 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783421908441&w=2
> > 
> > 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783422008445&w=2
> > 
> > What problems do you see with them?
> 
> I don't see a problem with these patches, but they should at least be
> reviewed on LKML once. Changes to core kernel infrastructure should not
> be merged silently via subsystem trees without any kind of ACKs.

Right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[David Miller]

From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:37:53 -0400

> Another big round of fixes for 2.6.27.  Included is also a renaming
> patch and some related patches that rename iwl4965 to iwlagn (reflecting
> that is supports iwl5000 as well).
> 
> The other big(ger) thing here is the new ath9k driver.  It is probably
> still far from perfect, but I'm hearing good reports on its
> functionality and the Atheros team (and others) have already been quite
> responsive on comments, etc.  I think it is best to go ahead and get it
> into 2.6.27.
> 
> Please let me know if there are problems!

I'm holding off on this pull until the list.h changes get so me lkml
ACKs.

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[Marcel Holtmann]

Hi John,

> > > > > Luis R. Rodriguez (4):
> > > > >       list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init()
> > > > >       list.h: add list_cut_position()
> > > > 
> > > > have these two changes got reviewed on LKML? I don't see any ACKs for it
> > > > in the commit message.
> > > 
> > > Hmmm...no.  I thought the original patches had been copied to
> > > linux-kernel, but it looks like that is not the case.
> > > 
> > > The original patches are archived here:
> > > 
> > > 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783421908441&w=2
> > > 
> > > 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783422008445&w=2
> > > 
> > > What problems do you see with them?
> > 
> > I don't see a problem with these patches, but they should at least be
> > reviewed on LKML once. Changes to core kernel infrastructure should not
> > be merged silently via subsystem trees without any kind of ACKs.
> 
> Yes, fine.  That wasn't my intent. :-)  The patches were originally
> posted about two weeks ago, too bad that didn't actually go to
> linux-kernel. :-(

just post them to LKML (or let Luis do it) so they get reviewed. I
really don't see an issue with them, but that is only me.

Regards

Marcel

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[Luis R. Rodriguez]

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
>> > > > > Luis R. Rodriguez (4):
>> > > > >       list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init()
>> > > > >       list.h: add list_cut_position()
>> > > >
>> > > > have these two changes got reviewed on LKML? I don't see any ACKs for it
>> > > > in the commit message.
>> > >
>> > > Hmmm...no.  I thought the original patches had been copied to
>> > > linux-kernel, but it looks like that is not the case.
>> > >
>> > > The original patches are archived here:
>> > >
>> > >   http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783421908441&w=2
>> > >
>> > >   http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783422008445&w=2
>> > >
>> > > What problems do you see with them?
>> >
>> > I don't see a problem with these patches, but they should at least be
>> > reviewed on LKML once. Changes to core kernel infrastructure should not
>> > be merged silently via subsystem trees without any kind of ACKs.
>>
>> Yes, fine.  That wasn't my intent. :-)  The patches were originally
>> posted about two weeks ago, too bad that didn't actually go to
>> linux-kernel. :-(
>
> just post them to LKML (or let Luis do it) so they get reviewed. I
> really don't see an issue with them, but that is only me.

I'll repost those specific patches and add lkml.

  Luis

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[Justin Mattock]

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>>> > > > > Luis R. Rodriguez (4):
>>> > > > >       list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init()
>>> > > > >       list.h: add list_cut_position()
>>> > > >
>>> > > > have these two changes got reviewed on LKML? I don't see any ACKs for it
>>> > > > in the commit message.
>>> > >
>>> > > Hmmm...no.  I thought the original patches had been copied to
>>> > > linux-kernel, but it looks like that is not the case.
>>> > >
>>> > > The original patches are archived here:
>>> > >
>>> > >   http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783421908441&w=2
>>> > >
>>> > >   http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783422008445&w=2
>>> > >
>>> > > What problems do you see with them?
>>> >
>>> > I don't see a problem with these patches, but they should at least be
>>> > reviewed on LKML once. Changes to core kernel infrastructure should not
>>> > be merged silently via subsystem trees without any kind of ACKs.
>>>
>>> Yes, fine.  That wasn't my intent. :-)  The patches were originally
>>> posted about two weeks ago, too bad that didn't actually go to
>>> linux-kernel. :-(
>>
>> just post them to LKML (or let Luis do it) so they get reviewed. I
>> really don't see an issue with them, but that is only me.
>
> I'll repost those specific patches and add lkml.
>
>  Luis
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

I must be honest, I am really excited
to see ath9k, finally an in kernel module
for my wireless card.

regards;

-- 
Justin P. Mattock

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[John W. Linville]

On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:01:47PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "John W. Linville" <linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:37:53 -0400
> 
> > Another big round of fixes for 2.6.27.  Included is also a renaming
> > patch and some related patches that rename iwl4965 to iwlagn (reflecting
> > that is supports iwl5000 as well).
> > 
> > The other big(ger) thing here is the new ath9k driver.  It is probably
> > still far from perfect, but I'm hearing good reports on its
> > functionality and the Atheros team (and others) have already been quite
> > responsive on comments, etc.  I think it is best to go ahead and get it
> > into 2.6.27.
> > 
> > Please let me know if there are problems!
> 
> I'm holding off on this pull until the list.h changes get so me lkml
> ACKs.

Sure, np.  I created a "no-ath9k" branch in case you are feeling
frisky -- it is the same except for omitting the list.h changes,
the ath5k pci table change, and the new ath9k driver.

	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git no-ath9k

Hth!

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[Pavel Roskin]

Quoting "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>:

> Sure, np.  I created a "no-ath9k" branch in case you are feeling
> frisky -- it is the same except for omitting the list.h changes,
> the ath5k pci table change, and the new ath9k driver.

You can keep the ath5k PCI table change.  Those devices are not  
supported by ath5k and not going to be supported, especially since  
ath9k supports them.  They are not even listed on  
http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers

The patch should go upstream quickly, so that potential ath9k users  
don't have to blacklist ath5k.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[David Miller]

From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 22:17:10 -0400

> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:01:47PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > I'm holding off on this pull until the list.h changes get so me lkml
> > ACKs.
> 
> Sure, np.  I created a "no-ath9k" branch in case you are feeling
> frisky -- it is the same except for omitting the list.h changes,
> the ath5k pci table change, and the new ath9k driver.
> 
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git no-ath9k
> 
> Hth!

Thanks John.

Due to the powerpc build failures the list.h stuff causes, I'm going
to pull this so I can do a push to Linus tonight.

Although I highly encourare you to get that list.h stuff sorted out
because I'd really like to see ath9k get merged in as that's a useful
device to support for a lot of users.

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1271 bytes --]

Hi David,

On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:28:14 -0700 (PDT) David Miller
<davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> From: "John W. Linville" <linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 22:17:10 -0400
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:01:47PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > I'm holding off on this pull until the list.h changes get so me lkml
> > > ACKs.
> > 
> > Sure, np.  I created a "no-ath9k" branch in case you are feeling
> > frisky -- it is the same except for omitting the list.h changes,
> > the ath5k pci table change, and the new ath9k driver.
> > 
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git no-ath9k
> > 
> > Hth!
> 
> Due to the powerpc build failures the list.h stuff causes, I'm going
             ^^^^^^^
It was a sparc64 defconfig that failed due to the list.h changes.  The
powerpc build only failed when I added an include of <linux/bug.h> to
list.h.

The powerpc compiler got an internal error trying to compile the ath9k
code - but I don't know if there is anything we can to do to the source
to work around that.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[John W. Linville]

On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:28:39PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:28:14 -0700 (PDT) David Miller
> <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> >
> > From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
> > Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 22:17:10 -0400
> > 
> > > On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:01:47PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > > I'm holding off on this pull until the list.h changes get so me lkml
> > > > ACKs.
> > > 
> > > Sure, np.  I created a "no-ath9k" branch in case you are feeling
> > > frisky -- it is the same except for omitting the list.h changes,
> > > the ath5k pci table change, and the new ath9k driver.
> > > 
> > > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git no-ath9k
> > > 
> > > Hth!
> > 
> > Due to the powerpc build failures the list.h stuff causes, I'm going
>              ^^^^^^^
> It was a sparc64 defconfig that failed due to the list.h changes.  The
> powerpc build only failed when I added an include of <linux/bug.h> to
> list.h.
> 
> The powerpc compiler got an internal error trying to compile the ath9k
> code - but I don't know if there is anything we can to do to the source
> to work around that.

FWIW I fixed-up the wireless-2.6 tree to reflect what davem pulled -- a
noop, but at least those patches shouldn't pollute -next tomorrow. :-)

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com

Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 504 bytes --]

Hi John,

On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:05:17 -0400 "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>
> FWIW I fixed-up the wireless-2.6 tree to reflect what davem pulled -- a
> noop, but at least those patches shouldn't pollute -next tomorrow. :-)

Thanks.  Every bit helps.  I am hoping my toolchain guy can come up with
a workaround for us.  And you guys can figure out the list.h thing.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]