From: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@visp.net.lb>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: thousands of classes, e1000 TX unit hang
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:13:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808051413.58795.denys@visp.net.lb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080805110453.GA6541@ff.dom.local>
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On 05-08-2008 12:05, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > I found, that packetloss happening when i am deleting/adding classes.
> > I attach result of oprofile as file.
>
> ...
>
> Deleting of estimators (gen_kill_estimator) isn't optimized for
> a large number of them, and it's a known issue. Adding of classes
> shouldn't be such a problem, but maybe you could try to do this
> before adding filters directing to those classes.
>
> Since you can control rate with htb, I'm not sure you really need
> policing: at least you could try if removing this changes anything.
> And I'm not sure: do these tx hangs happen only when classes are
> added/deleted or otherwise too?
>
> Jarek P.
Policer is creating burst for me.
For example first 2Mbyte(+rate*time if need more precision) will pass on high
speed (1Mbit), then if flow is still using maximum bandwidth will be
throttled to rate of HTB. When i tried to play with cburst/burst values in
HTB i was not able to archieve same results. I can do same with TBF and his
peakrate/burst, but not with HTB.
It happens when root qdisc deleted(which holds around 130 child classes).
Probably gen_kill_estimator taking all resources while i am deleting root
class.
I did some test, on machine with 150 ppp interfaces (Pentium 4 3.2 Ghz),
just by deleting root qdisc and i got huge packetloss. When i am just adding
classes - there is no significant packetloss.
Probably it is not right thing, when i am deleting qdisc on ppp - causing
packetloss on whole system? Is it possible to workaround, till
gen_kill_estimator will be rewritten?
But sure i can try to avoid "mass deleting" classes, but i think many people
will hit this bug, especially newbies, who implement "many class" setup.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-05 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-05 7:47 thousands of classes, e1000 TX unit hang Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-08-05 8:06 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-08-05 10:05 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-08-05 11:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-05 11:13 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko [this message]
2008-08-05 12:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-05 13:02 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-08-05 16:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-05 16:48 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-08-05 21:14 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-05 14:07 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-08-05 16:48 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-05 17:18 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-08-06 1:13 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808051413.58795.denys@visp.net.lb \
--to=denys@visp.net.lb \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).