From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: "e100_probe: Error clearing wake event" when booting 2.6.27-rc1 Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 00:00:06 +0200 Message-ID: <200808080000.07156.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200808051730.27599.alessandro.guido@gmail.com> <200808052203.07815.rjw@sisk.pl> <200808070947.37534.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alessandro Guido , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pm list To: Jesse Barnes Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200808070947.37534.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thursday, 7 of August 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Tuesday, August 5, 2008 1:03 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, 5 of August 2008, Alessandro Guido wrote: > > > [please cc me on replies] > > > > > > I'm getting this error message when booting my laptop. > > > > > > The commit that causes this is: > > > > > > commit eb9d0fe40e313c0a74115ef456a2e43a6c8da72f > > > Author: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > Date: Mon Jul 7 03:34:48 2008 +0200 > > > > > > PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up > > > > > > [very long commit message snipped] > > > > > > Should I ignore that? > > > > The message is harmless, but it exposes the problem that e100_probe() > > should not use pci_enable_wake() for this purpose. > > > > The appended patch makes it use pci_pme_active() instead. > > I can take the pci_pme_active bits, but the e100 stuff should go in through > Jeff probably. Care to respin? Sure, in replies to this message. Thanks, Rafael