From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] netlabel: Replace protocol/NetLabel linking with refrerence counts
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 15:42:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808091542.28776.paul.moore@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080809170840.GF8125@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Saturday 09 August 2008 1:08:40 pm Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 10:43:22AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > NetLabel has always had a list of backpointers in the CIPSO DOI
> > definition structure which pointed to the NetLabel LSM domain
> > mapping structures which referenced the CIPSO DOI struct. The
> > rationale for this was that when an administrator removed a CIPSO
> > DOI from the system all of the associated NetLabel LSM domain
> > mappings should be removed as well; a list of backpointers made
> > this a simple operation.
> >
> > Unfortunately, while the backpointers did make the removal easier
> > they were a bit of a mess from an implementation point of view
> > which was making further development difficult. Since the removal
> > of a CIPSO DOI is a realtively rare event it seems to make sense to
> > remove this backpointer list as the optimization was hurting us
> > more then it was helping. However, we still need to be able to
> > track when a CIPSO DOI definition is being used so replace the
> > backpointer list with a reference count. In order to preserve the
> > current functionality of removing the associated LSM domain
> > mappings when a CIPSO DOI is removed we walk the LSM domain mapping
> > table, removing the relevant entries.
>
> Looks good from an RCU viewpoint!
Great, thanks for all your help :)
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-09 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-09 14:43 [RFC PATCH] netlabel: Replace protocol/NetLabel linking with refrerence counts Paul Moore
2008-08-09 17:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-09 19:42 ` Paul Moore [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808091542.28776.paul.moore@hp.com \
--to=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).