From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Cc: alex.williamson@hp.com, kaber@trash.net,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, buytenh@marvell.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11316] New: severe performance regression for iptables nat routing
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:56:55 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080815.145655.154408190.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080815053548.GA6366@gondor.apana.org.au>
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:35:48 +1000
> loopback: Drop obsolete ip_summed setting
>
> Now that the network stack can handle inbound packets with partial
> checksums, we should no longer clobber the ip_summed field in the
> loopback driver. This is because CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY implies that
> the checksum field is actually valid which is not true for loopback
> packets since it's only partial (and thus complemented).
>
> This allows packets from lo to then be SNATed to an external source
> while still preserving the checksum's validity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
I've applied this one too, let me know if I should not have :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-15 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-11316-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2008-08-13 5:12 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 11316] New: severe performance regression for iptables nat routing Andrew Morton
2008-08-14 2:08 ` Alex Williamson
2008-08-14 2:21 ` David Miller
2008-08-14 11:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-08-14 15:08 ` Alex Williamson
2008-08-15 4:44 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-15 5:35 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-15 5:49 ` Alex Williamson
2008-08-15 6:17 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-15 21:56 ` David Miller [this message]
[not found] ` <1218778238.23510.22.camel@2710p.home>
2008-08-15 7:33 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-15 8:14 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-15 10:32 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-15 10:53 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-15 15:34 ` Alex Williamson
2008-08-15 21:55 ` David Miller
2008-08-15 21:55 ` David Miller
2008-08-15 20:58 ` David Miller
2008-08-16 0:25 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-15 21:54 ` David Miller
2008-08-14 22:00 ` David Miller
2008-08-15 4:34 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080815.145655.154408190.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@hp.com \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=buytenh@marvell.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).