From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Denys Fedoryshchenko Subject: Re: panic 2.6.27-rc3-git2, qdisc_dequeue_head Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:36:17 +0300 Message-ID: <200808172236.17857.denys@visp.net.lb> References: <20080815190905.M56388@visp.net.lb> <200808171603.22151.denys@visp.net.lb> <20080817133608.GA3584@ami.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jarek Poplawski Return-path: Received: from relay2.globalproof.net ([194.146.153.25]:48786 "EHLO relay2.globalproof.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751080AbYHQTh3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:37:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080817133608.GA3584@ami.dom.local> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I am lost in patches :-) When you will be back, let me know if order and set of patches is correct. Here is what i am using: http://www.nuclearcat.com/patches/00-prevfixes1.patch http://www.nuclearcat.com/patches/00-prevfixes2.patch http://www.nuclearcat.com/patches/01-take3.patch http://www.nuclearcat.com/patches/02-fix1.patch http://www.nuclearcat.com/patches/03-fix_patch_2.patch And thanks for your help! I cannot take risk and put to wide production, since it is crashing sometimes, but i guess in few days we can make it ready for production. On Sunday 17 August 2008, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 04:03:22PM +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > > All patches applied. > > On normal shaper i got just this warning mentioned before. > > On alternative shaper (it is not using TBF anymore, it is using flow > > classifier and many HTB classes) - it is panicing. > > > > After applying all rules, most probably it is happened when some traffic > > passed over there. I can't be absolutely sure in that, but it looks like > > at that time there is no actions by iproute2/tc done. Just traffic. > > > > This is same PC where WARNING appeared which i mention in previous mail. > > So maybe it is result of that warning, no idea... > > BTW, I'll have to have a break for today, so I'll be able to respond > only tomorrow. Your testing is very valuable and this all needs > rethinking, but as before, I doubt current -rc is good choice for > production. > > Cheers, > Jarek P.