netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@stealer.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	wensong@linux-vs.org, ja@ssi.bg
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipvs: Fix race conditions in lblc scheduler
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:45:16 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080819074515.GC4387@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0808190128260.12259@titan.stealer.net>

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 01:38:42AM +0200, Sven Wegener wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Simon Horman wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:52:08AM +0200, Sven Wegener wrote:
> > > We can't access the cache entry outside of our critical read-locked region,
> > > because someone may free that entry. And we also need to check in the critical
> > > region wether the destination is still available, i.e. it's not in the trash.
> > > If we drop our reference counter, the destination can be purged from the trash
> > > at any time. Our caller only guarantees that no destination is moved to the
> > > trash, while we are scheduling. Also there is no need for our own rwlock,
> > > there is already one in the service structure for use in the schedulers.
> > 
> > this looks good to me. I have confirmed that it applies against lvs-2.6
> > (but not net-2.6 as changes that are already in lvs-2.6 are needed).
> 
> Yes, I've based it on your tree.
> 
> > One minor style question.  You have changed struct ip_vs_lblc_table to *tbl
> > in several places, (e.g. sizeof(*tbl) ). I think that I prefer things the
> > way that they were. Was there a reason for this change?
> 
> In this patch series, no. I prefer them like sizeof(*tbl) as it's more 
> robust, when changing the type of tbl. Changing the type of tbl and 
> forgeting the sizeof() in kmalloc will result in hard to track down bugs, 
> if the old type is still valid. Using sizeof(*tbl) will nearly always get 
> you the correct value you want, without keeping all the types in sizeof() 
> in sync. The compiler already knows the type of tbl, so no need to be 
> explicit about it, when allocating memory for it.

Hi Sven,

sorry about the noise on this. I have applied it to lvs-2.6.


      reply	other threads:[~2008-08-19  7:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-17 22:52 [PATCH] ipvs: Fix race conditions in lblc scheduler Sven Wegener
2008-08-18 12:20 ` Simon Horman
2008-08-18 15:47   ` Sven Wegener
2008-08-18 23:19 ` Simon Horman
2008-08-18 23:38   ` Sven Wegener
2008-08-19  7:45     ` Simon Horman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080819074515.GC4387@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=ja@ssi.bg \
    --cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sven.wegener@stealer.net \
    --cc=wensong@linux-vs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).