netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, jeff@garzik.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pkt_sched: restore multiqueue prio scheduler
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:53:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080824075331.GA2721@ami.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f2db9d90808231209i134a7afbu233269c8ea592422@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:09:42PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 9:49 AM, jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-23-08 at 09:31 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >
> >> Actually in this new multiple tx queue kernel this qdisc could serve a
> >> very specific but needed purpose which just became apparent to me.
> >> This qdisc resolves one very specific issue, head-of-line blocking if
> >> one of the hardware queues is full.  What if I reversed things a bit
> >> in prio_classify so that skb->queue_mapping determined the band
> >> instead of the other way around in the case of the multiqueue option
> >> being enabled?  I would think that in this configuration the qdisc
> >> would prove to be pretty useful for purposes other than QOS since it
> >> would allow a classful qdisc per transmit queue instead of per device.

I'm not sure if I don't miss your point, but if you decided you can do
this with a new action there is probably no reason to change or revert
anything in prio_classify - you pass the band/class number as a result.

...
> >> I could then create a select_queue for the device that returns 0 when
> >> in DCB/EEDC mode for our drivers, implement the tc action to set the
> >> queue mapping, and have essentially the same result as I had before.
> >>
> > put overflow queues in your driver. With the new multiq approach the
> > controls are per-queue not per driver.
> >
> 
> I think you missed the email from Dave earlier, either that or I am
> not understanding something and if I am feel free to explain.  My
> understanding is that when we assign a new qdisc via tc the
> qdisc/transmit queues end up with a configuration kind of like what
> Dave has on slide 7 at
> (http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/davem_seattle08.pdf).  Adding more
> queues doesn't resolve anything since I am still going through the
> same qdisc regardless of how many queues I have.  The changes to the
> dequeue portion of this qdisc are the most important part for this
> change since I need them to keep the qdisc from jamming up in a
> dequeue/requeue loop if the packet at the head of the qdisc needs to
> go to a stopped hardware transmit queue.

I guess, Jamal meant additional, backup queues, and you're thinking
about remapping to the basic, working queues. There is a question
if it's not enough to check and do this during classification, then
changes to prio's ->dequeue() would be also unnecessary. On the other
hand, if you proved in some tests it's worth to do in dequeue, I think
David is a reasonable guy and should let for such improvements. BTW,
if this jamming with requeuing is really a problem, probably it should
be also considered in the generic code like simple_tx_hash() by using
some mask.

Thanks,
Jarek P.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-24  7:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-22  0:51 [PATCH 1/3] LRO: fix return code propogation Jeff Kirsher
2008-08-22  0:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] netlink: nal_parse_nested_compat was not parsing nested attributes Jeff Kirsher
2008-08-22 10:18   ` David Miller
2008-08-22 17:40     ` [PATCH 2/3] netlink: nla_parse_nested_compat " Duyck, Alexander H
2008-08-27 14:52       ` Thomas Graf
2008-08-27 18:09         ` Duyck, Alexander H
2008-08-22  0:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] pkt_sched: restore multiqueue prio scheduler Jeff Kirsher
2008-08-22 10:16   ` David Miller
2008-08-22 14:30     ` jamal
2008-08-22 22:19       ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-23  0:01         ` Alexander Duyck
2008-08-23  0:40           ` David Miller
2008-08-23  1:37             ` Alexander Duyck
2008-08-23  5:12               ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-23  6:35                 ` Alexander Duyck
2008-08-23  7:07                   ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-23  8:23                   ` David Miller
2008-08-23  8:15               ` David Miller
2008-08-23  0:33         ` David Miller
2008-08-23  8:47           ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-23 16:31             ` Alexander Duyck
2008-08-23 16:49               ` jamal
2008-08-23 19:09                 ` Alexander Duyck
2008-08-24  7:53                   ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2008-08-24 13:39                     ` jamal
2008-08-24 19:19                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-24 19:27                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-24 19:59                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-24 20:18                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-25  0:50                           ` David Miller
2008-08-25  3:03                             ` Alexander Duyck
2008-08-25  6:16                               ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-25  9:36                                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-25  0:49                         ` David Miller
2008-08-25  6:06                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-25  7:48                             ` David Miller
2008-08-25  7:57                               ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-25  8:02                                 ` David Miller
2008-08-25  8:25                                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-25  8:35                                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-22 10:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] LRO: fix return code propogation David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080824075331.GA2721@ami.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).