From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E2niel?= Fraga Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp FRTO: in-order-only "TCP proxy" fragility workaround Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:56:50 -0300 Message-ID: <20080830035650.42be37d7@tux> References: <20080819213417.45133573@tux> <20080822183224.2d52f16c@tux> <20080822.143709.65615512.davem@davemloft.net> <20080823111446.06a350a2@tux> <20080824163843.33b4f890@tux> <20080826141812.589848a0@tux> <20080828184919.611dd578@tux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com, billfink@mindspring.com, Netdev , Patrick Hardy , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu To: "Ilpo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?=" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:07:04 +0300 (EEST) "Ilpo J=E4rvinen" wrote: > ...as it would probably not be wise to make a full dump available (th= at it=20 > would contain every syscall). Alternatively, you can create one full = dump=20 > for yourself and just grep the relevant parts. There may be need to s= trace > more than one process (all dovecot related). While waiting for a stall, I was thinking here: is there any chance it could be a bug generated by gcc 4.3? I saw the date gcc 4.3.0 was released and it's just after 2.6.24 and before 2.6.25... I was using gcc 4.3.1 and now 4.3.2... but maybe I could try go back to gcc 4.2.4 to test... Which version of gcc you developers are using? --=20 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html