From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED] [NET-NEXT PATCH 1/2] pkt_sched: Add multiqueue scheduler support
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 05:54:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080902055411.GA4180@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1220309354.14337.34.camel@ahduyck-laptop>
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 03:49:14PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 23:05 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> > Mostly looks OK to me, but a few (late) doubts below:
>
> Most of your suggestions I agree with, with the following exceptions.
> > ...
> > > +static int multiq_tune(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt)
> > > +{
> > > + struct multiq_sched_data *q = qdisc_priv(sch);
> > > + struct tc_multiq_qopt *qopt;
> > > + struct Qdisc **queues;
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + if (sch->parent != TC_H_ROOT)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > Is it necessary?
> >
> I think so. Basically I want to have this qdisc as the root for all
> other qdiscs because the hardware queue decision needs to be made as
> soon as possible in order to avoid any head of line blocking issues.
> This way you don't end up with multiple qdiscs fighting over hardware
> queues.
OK, but I wonder if it's not enough to treat this as a recommendation?
Actually, since dequeuing is under the common lock here, the main
difference seems to be this checking for subqueue_stopped could happen
a bit earlier, but this should be safe (a subqueue can't get another
packets in the meantime). So maybe I miss something but this looks
like blocking safe even when used as prio's leaf.
Thanks,
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-02 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-30 7:23 [UPDATED] [NET-NEXT PATCH 1/2] pkt_sched: Add multiqueue scheduler support Jeff Kirsher
2008-08-30 7:24 ` [UPDATED] [NET-NEXT PATCH 2/2] pkt_action: add new action skbedit Jeff Kirsher
2008-09-02 12:27 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-09-01 21:05 ` [UPDATED] [NET-NEXT PATCH 1/2] pkt_sched: Add multiqueue scheduler support Jarek Poplawski
2008-09-01 22:49 ` Alexander Duyck
2008-09-02 5:54 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2008-09-02 7:52 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-09-02 17:18 ` Duyck, Alexander H
2008-09-02 20:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-09-02 20:53 ` Alexander Duyck
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-30 7:21 Jeff Kirsher
2008-09-12 3:11 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080902055411.GA4180@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).