From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 02/14] selinux: Better local/forward check in selinux_ip_postroute()
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:48:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080903004854.15669.95990.stgit@flek.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080903003647.15669.45349.stgit@flek.lan>
It turns out that checking to see if skb->sk is NULL is not a very good
indicator of a forwarded packet as some locally generated packets also have
skb->sk set to NULL. Fix this by not only checking the skb->sk field but also
the IP[6]CB(skb)->flags field for the IP[6]SKB_FORWARDED flag.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
---
security/selinux/hooks.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 03fc6a8..995488d 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -4562,19 +4562,37 @@ static unsigned int selinux_ip_postroute(struct sk_buff *skb, int ifindex,
if (!secmark_active && !peerlbl_active)
return NF_ACCEPT;
- /* if the packet is locally generated (skb->sk != NULL) then use the
- * socket's label as the peer label, otherwise the packet is being
- * forwarded through this system and we need to fetch the peer label
- * directly from the packet */
+ /* if the packet is being forwarded then get the peer label from the
+ * packet itself; otherwise check to see if it is from a local
+ * application or the kernel, if from an application get the peer label
+ * from the sending socket, otherwise use the kernel's sid */
sk = skb->sk;
- if (sk) {
+ if (sk == NULL) {
+ switch (family) {
+ case PF_INET:
+ if (IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_FORWARDED)
+ secmark_perm = PACKET__FORWARD_OUT;
+ else
+ secmark_perm = PACKET__SEND;
+ break;
+ case PF_INET6:
+ if (IP6CB(skb)->flags & IP6SKB_FORWARDED)
+ secmark_perm = PACKET__FORWARD_OUT;
+ else
+ secmark_perm = PACKET__SEND;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return NF_DROP;
+ }
+ if (secmark_perm == PACKET__FORWARD_OUT) {
+ if (selinux_skb_peerlbl_sid(skb, family, &peer_sid))
+ return NF_DROP;
+ } else
+ peer_sid = SECINITSID_KERNEL;
+ } else {
struct sk_security_struct *sksec = sk->sk_security;
peer_sid = sksec->sid;
secmark_perm = PACKET__SEND;
- } else {
- if (selinux_skb_peerlbl_sid(skb, family, &peer_sid))
- return NF_DROP;
- secmark_perm = PACKET__FORWARD_OUT;
}
if (secmark_active)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-03 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-03 0:48 [RFC PATCH v4 00/14] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.28 Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/14] netlabel: Remove unneeded in-kernel API functions Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:48 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2008-09-05 8:51 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/14] selinux: Better local/forward check in selinux_ip_postroute() James Morris
2008-09-05 21:58 ` Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/14] selinux: Fix a problem in security_netlbl_sid_to_secattr() Paul Moore
2008-09-05 8:53 ` James Morris
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/14] selinux: Fix missing calls to netlbl_skbuff_err() Paul Moore
2008-09-05 8:55 ` James Morris
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/14] smack: " Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/14] netlabel: Replace protocol/NetLabel linking with refrerence counts Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/14] netlabel: Add a generic way to create ordered linked lists of network addrs Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/14] netlabel: Add network address selectors to the NetLabel/LSM domain mapping Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/14] netlabel: Add functionality to set the security attributes of a packet Paul Moore
2008-09-05 9:03 ` James Morris
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/14] selinux: Set socket NetLabel based on connection endpoint Paul Moore
2008-09-05 9:08 ` James Morris
2008-09-03 0:50 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/14] selinux: Cache NetLabel secattrs in the socket's security struct Paul Moore
2008-09-05 9:12 ` James Morris
2008-09-03 0:50 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/14] netlabel: Changes to the NetLabel security attributes to allow LSMs to pass full contexts Paul Moore
2008-09-05 9:12 ` James Morris
2008-09-03 0:50 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/14] cipso: Add support for native local labeling and fixup mapping names Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:50 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/14] netlabel: Add configuration support for local labeling Paul Moore
2008-09-03 3:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/14] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.28 Casey Schaufler
2008-09-03 14:05 ` Paul Moore
2008-09-04 11:44 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080903004854.15669.95990.stgit@flek.lan \
--to=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).