From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/14] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.28
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:44:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200809040744.24717.paul.moore@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809031005.59102.paul.moore@hp.com>
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 10:05:59 am Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 September 2008 8:48:41 pm Paul Moore wrote:
> > Since I'm reasonable certain there are no really nasty regressions,
> > I've added sign-offs to all the patches now. I expect there will
> > probably be another spin or two to take care of bugs yet to be
> > found and fix other various things that pop-up (maybe even the
> > Smack stuff if I can find the time) but the patches are in
> > reasonably good shape right now. I also did a test merge/compile
> > with the September 2nd linux-next tree and there were no nasty
> > surprises so I'm also pushing these patches to my lblnet-2.6_next
> > tree which means you should see them in tomorrow's linux-next tree
> > if all goes well.
>
> Just an FYI, it looks like I may have missed the cut for the
> September 3rd linux-next tree. The patches should be in there for
> tomorrow's tree.
... another quick update, I just verified that the patches are included
in the September 4th linux-next tree so if you are feeling particularly
adventurous you can try testing that tree as well (be warned, it will
likely be much less stable than the lblnet-2.6_testing tree due to the
high degree of flux).
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-04 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-03 0:48 [RFC PATCH v4 00/14] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.28 Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/14] netlabel: Remove unneeded in-kernel API functions Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/14] selinux: Better local/forward check in selinux_ip_postroute() Paul Moore
2008-09-05 8:51 ` James Morris
2008-09-05 21:58 ` Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/14] selinux: Fix a problem in security_netlbl_sid_to_secattr() Paul Moore
2008-09-05 8:53 ` James Morris
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/14] selinux: Fix missing calls to netlbl_skbuff_err() Paul Moore
2008-09-05 8:55 ` James Morris
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/14] smack: " Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/14] netlabel: Replace protocol/NetLabel linking with refrerence counts Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/14] netlabel: Add a generic way to create ordered linked lists of network addrs Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/14] netlabel: Add network address selectors to the NetLabel/LSM domain mapping Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/14] netlabel: Add functionality to set the security attributes of a packet Paul Moore
2008-09-05 9:03 ` James Morris
2008-09-03 0:49 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/14] selinux: Set socket NetLabel based on connection endpoint Paul Moore
2008-09-05 9:08 ` James Morris
2008-09-03 0:50 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/14] selinux: Cache NetLabel secattrs in the socket's security struct Paul Moore
2008-09-05 9:12 ` James Morris
2008-09-03 0:50 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/14] netlabel: Changes to the NetLabel security attributes to allow LSMs to pass full contexts Paul Moore
2008-09-05 9:12 ` James Morris
2008-09-03 0:50 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/14] cipso: Add support for native local labeling and fixup mapping names Paul Moore
2008-09-03 0:50 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/14] netlabel: Add configuration support for local labeling Paul Moore
2008-09-03 3:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/14] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.28 Casey Schaufler
2008-09-03 14:05 ` Paul Moore
2008-09-04 11:44 ` Paul Moore [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200809040744.24717.paul.moore@hp.com \
--to=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).