From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipvs: load balance ipv6 connections from a local process Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 10:30:32 +1000 Message-ID: <20080908003031.GA19630@verge.net.au> References: <20080905013609.GD14128@verge.net.au> <20080905013755.GE14128@verge.net.au> <20080906041436.GB21521@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, Malcolm Turnbull , Siim =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=F5der?= , Vince Busam To: Julius Volz Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:38462 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750823AbYIHAae (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Sep 2008 20:30:34 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Julius Volz wrote: > On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:40:31PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Just some minor things: > > > > Hi Julius, > > > > thanks for pointing these out. I will send patches to fix these problems ASAP. > > Thanks, looking good! > > > More generally speaking, sorry to all parties concerned for applying > > these two patches a little prematurely. At this stage I'd rather move > > forward rather than roll the tree back. But I am happy to discuss this. > > Probably better to just go forward when the tree is already public? Yes, thats what I was thinking to.