From: juliusv@google.com (Julius Volz)
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Siim Põder" <siim@p6drad-teel.net>,
"Julian Anastasov" <ja@ssi.bg>,
"Malcolm Turnbull" <malcolm@loadbalancer.org>,
"Vince Busam" <vbusam@google.com>,
"Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:42:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080908114258.GA29477@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080908104120.GB5795@verge.net.au>
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:41:22PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 12:03:04PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:04 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The impetus for this series of patches is Julian Anastasov noting
> > > that "load balance IPv4 connections from a local process" checks
> > > for 0 TCP checksums. Herbert Xu confirmed that this is not legal,
> > > even on loopback traffic, but that rather partial checksums are
> > > possible.
> > >
> > > The first patch in this series is a proposed solution to handle
> > > partial checksums for both TCP and UDP.
> > >
> > > The other two patches clean things up a bit.
> > >
> > > I have not tested this code beyond compilation yet.
> >
> > After some first tests, remote connections are still working, but not
> > local ones from the director. The TCP handshake works and the
> > connection is established, but all following packets arriving at the
> > real server have an incorrect TCP checksum.
> >
> > Btw., this happens both with and without this last series of patches,
> > so I can't get the local client feature working at all. Looking at it
> > further...
>
> Ok, is this for both IPv4 & IPv6? Does it still occur with just the first
> patch in this series applied?
It's for both, although I only tested IPv4 at first. Here is a complete
test matrix of what works when:
CR = connection refused
T = connection timeout
C = connection established, but not working afterwards
OK = working
remote client | local client
COMMIT v4 v6 | v4 v6
======================================|=================
CSUM 3/3 OK T | C T
CSUM 2/3 OK T | C T
CSUM 1/3 OK T | OK T
W/O CSUM OK T | C T
... |
f2428ed5 OK T | CR CR
4856c84c OK CR | CR CR
f94fd041 (my last one) OK OK | CR CR
So the last time that IPv6 was working _at all_ was at my last commit of
the big v6 series...
Julius
--
Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps
Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-020.4.028.116-1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-08 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-08 2:04 [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates Simon Horman
2008-09-08 2:04 ` [rfc 1/3] ipvs: handle PARTIAL_CHECKSUM Simon Horman
2008-09-08 7:24 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-08 9:05 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-08 9:54 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-08 2:04 ` [rfc 2/3] ipvs: Use inet_proto_csum_replace*() Simon Horman
2008-09-08 2:04 ` [rfc 3/3] ipvs: Consolidate checksuming code Simon Horman
2008-09-08 10:03 ` [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates Julius Volz
2008-09-08 10:41 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-08 11:42 ` Julius Volz [this message]
2008-09-08 11:57 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-08 12:04 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-08 12:14 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-08 12:34 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-08 13:12 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-08 13:20 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-08 13:42 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-08 15:32 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-08 23:22 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-08 23:40 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-09 9:30 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-09 11:31 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-10 17:30 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-10 23:29 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-11 13:07 ` Wensong Zhang
2008-09-11 13:45 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-11 13:55 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-11 14:43 ` Wensong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080908114258.GA29477@google.com \
--to=juliusv@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=malcolm@loadbalancer.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=siim@p6drad-teel.net \
--cc=vbusam@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).