From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 09:22:06 +1000 Message-ID: <20080908232203.GD13048@verge.net.au> References: <20080908104120.GB5795@verge.net.au> <20080908114258.GA29477@google.com> <20080908115734.GA24228@verge.net.au> <20080908120413.GB24228@verge.net.au> <20080908123450.GC24228@verge.net.au> <20080908132049.GA11119@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Siim =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=F5der?= , Julian Anastasov , Malcolm Turnbull , Vince Busam , Herbert Xu To: Julius Volz Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: lvs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 05:32:47PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Julius Volz wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > >> I'm not so concerned about IPv6 local not working for now - > >> its a combination of two new features. And hopefully we > >> can iron it out in the not to distant future anyway. > > > > Yes, probably just some minor bug... > > Actually, it wasn't even a kernel bug, but a configuration error - I > was using LVS/NAT, but still had the dummy0 interface with the IPv6 > VIP configured on the real server (from the DR case). And in the local > client case, the source address is the VIP, so the real server just > delivered the response to itself. > > Now I can confirm that everything is working (without your last two > patches and with the one removing the wrong ip_route_me_harder)! Great!