From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Cc: timo.teras@iki.fi, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: xfrm_state locking regression...
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:38:08 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080909.203808.112347106.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080910032304.GA28580@gondor.apana.org.au>
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:23:04 +1000
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 08:22:15PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > > What could be done though is to remove x->all and restore the
> > > original walking by hashing. This would eliminate a list node
> > > from xfrm_state, and would also restore the original dump ordering.
> >
> > Yes I remember you mentioning that.
> >
> > If you're too busy I can try to spin this idea into a patch.
>
> That would be very much appreciated. Thanks Dave!
No problem. It might be a little bit of a chore because this new
walker design is intimately tied to the af_key non-atomic dump
changes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-10 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-03 2:51 xfrm_state locking regression David Miller
2008-09-03 3:00 ` David Miller
2008-09-03 5:01 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-03 5:07 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-03 5:23 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-03 5:39 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-03 5:40 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-09 12:25 ` David Miller
2008-09-03 5:39 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-03 5:45 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-03 5:50 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-03 6:14 ` David Miller
2008-09-03 6:27 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-03 6:35 ` David Miller
2008-09-03 6:45 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-03 6:47 ` David Miller
2008-09-03 7:14 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-05 11:55 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-09 0:09 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 0:18 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-09 0:20 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 0:25 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 14:33 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-09 20:20 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 3:01 ` David Miller
2008-09-11 21:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-09-11 22:00 ` David Miller
2008-09-11 23:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-09-12 16:08 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-12 17:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-09-21 12:29 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-21 15:21 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-22 11:42 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-22 13:01 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-22 23:50 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 4:53 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 4:59 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 5:17 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 5:22 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 6:25 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 6:47 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 6:56 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 9:39 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 11:24 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 12:08 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 12:14 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 12:25 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 12:56 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 13:01 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 13:07 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 13:30 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 13:32 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 13:46 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-24 4:23 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-24 5:14 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-24 5:15 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-24 5:46 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-24 5:55 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-24 6:04 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-24 6:13 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-24 6:20 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-24 6:21 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-24 7:29 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-24 7:54 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-24 13:18 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-24 14:08 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-25 6:03 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-25 7:57 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-25 8:42 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-25 8:56 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-25 9:01 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-25 9:49 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-25 12:12 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-25 12:36 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-26 2:08 ` Herbert Xu
2008-10-01 10:07 ` David Miller
2008-10-01 14:05 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 2:48 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 3:04 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 3:15 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-10 3:22 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 3:23 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-10 3:38 ` David Miller [this message]
2008-09-10 4:01 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-10 4:06 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 4:22 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-10 4:24 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 4:48 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 4:52 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 4:53 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-10 5:21 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 5:16 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-10 5:23 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 5:46 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-03 6:10 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080909.203808.112347106.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=timo.teras@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).