From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 13:09:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20080909120933.GE31314@sirena.org.uk> References: <48C60FFC.8090109@redhat.com> <20080908.230221.101659829.davem@davemloft.net> <20080909103137.GD31314@sirena.org.uk> <20080909.050500.200863990.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: csnook@redhat.com, rick.jones2@hp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:2294 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753081AbYIIMJi (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 08:09:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080909.050500.200863990.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 05:05:00AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Mark Brown > > FWIW the problem with this and some other mails you raised this on > > recently is that they're sent with format=folowed which tells the > > receiving MUA that it's OK to reflow the text to fit the display. > I'll have to see why MEW isn't handling that correctly then, > it even claims to support this in the version I am using :) Handling it correctly is probably the problem - if it's working as expected then when your window is wide enough to display lines longer than 80 columns it'll go ahead and reflow the text to fill the window.