From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: patchwork for netdev Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 03:13:07 -0400 Message-ID: <20080919071307.GA22242@infradead.org> References: <20080918.165607.55765591.davem@davemloft.net> <20080918.170547.114615421.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, linville@tuxdriver.com To: "Randy.Dunlap" Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:53709 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756441AbYISHNL (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2008 03:13:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:09:14PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > I was hoping those ACK emails would be one of the things I could stop > > doing if patchwork is effective. Not immediately, but eventually. > > Well, that's a reasonable goal. OTOH, if everyone wants to know > if their patch was applied, then having 50 people look at a web page > (or at a git tree) is more total overhead than one person generating > an email. IMHO. But maybe it depends on which side is being optimized. Could patchworks please generate the ACK mail automatically?