From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure.
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20080920.130430.267667082.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1221932404.1343.196.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<20080920110952.05da49ab@infradead.org>
	<1221936751.1343.226.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: arjan@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
	steffen.klassert@secunet.com
To: dwalker@mvista.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:34257
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751112AbYITUEm (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:04:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1221936751.1343.226.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 11:52:31 -0700

> All that vs. bouncing data around the caches.. To what degree has all
> that been handled or thought about?

Give concrete things to discuss or just be quiet.