From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Implement lookup table for feature-negotiation information Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:21:05 -0300 Message-ID: <20080922142105.GB16625@ghostprotocols.net> References: <20080921.235853.223987556.davem@davemloft.net> <1222068117-13401-1-git-send-email-gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <1222068117-13401-2-git-send-email-gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <1222068117-13401-3-git-send-email-gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dccp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Gerrit Renker Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:48866 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752024AbYIVOaE (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:30:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1222068117-13401-3-git-send-email-gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:21:54AM +0200, Gerrit Renker escreveu: > A lookup table for feature-negotiation information, extracted from RFC 4340/42, > is provided by this patch. All currently known features can be found in this > table, along with their feature location, their default value, and type. > > Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker > Acked-by: Ian McDonald > --- > include/linux/dccp.h | 9 ++-- > net/dccp/feat.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > --- a/include/linux/dccp.h > +++ b/include/linux/dccp.h > > + > +static int dccp_feat_default_value(u8 feat_num) > +{ > + int idx = dccp_feat_index(feat_num); > + > + return idx < 0 ? : dccp_feat_table[idx].default_value; > +} [acme@doppio ~]$ cat dd.c #include int main(void) { int idx = -2; printf("%d\n", idx < 0 ? : 10); printf("%d\n", idx < 0 ? idx : 10); return 0; } [acme@doppio ~]$ ./dd 1 -2 [acme@doppio ~]$ Which one do you want? The boolean result as the value to be returned or the index if it is < 0? I tried to check on the other 4 patches on this series to check if usage clarified if it was correct, but there is no use of dccp_feat_default_value() on this 5 patches, perhaps it could be deferred to when it actually gets used? - Arnaldo