From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: Machine Check Exception Re: NetDev! Please help! Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:23:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20080922172349.GA2545@ami.dom.local> References: <48D4F85C.8090709@bigtelecom.ru> <200809202111.01256.denys@visp.net.lb> <48D67239.9040006@gmail.com> <48D7385D.40107@bigtelecom.ru> <20080922065339.GA4399@ff.dom.local> <48D76813.9000603@bigtelecom.ru> <20080922112452.GB5314@ff.dom.local> <48D79709.80400@bigtelecom.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Denys Fedoryshchenko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Badalian Vyacheslav Return-path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.27]:65206 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752174AbYIVRX4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:23:56 -0400 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so458840eyi.37 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48D79709.80400@bigtelecom.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 05:00:57PM +0400, Badalian Vyacheslav wrote: > > > BTW: could you try to trigger this bug with one network card off? > > > > > Shire! I stop eth1 and do "/etc/init.d/bgpd stop" (this pc not get route > traffic anymore).... > > run "emerge portage" 2 times and get: > > [25492.187405] CPU 3: Machine Check Exception: 0000000000000005 > [25492.187405] MCE: The hardware reports a non fatal, correctable > incident occurred on CPU 1. > [25492.187405] Bank 0: b200004000000800 > [25492.187405] MCE: The hardware reports a non fatal, correctable > incident occurred on CPU 1. > [25492.187405] Bank 5: b200120014040400 > [25497.124884] CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 0000000000000004 > [25497.124884] Kernel panic - not syncing: Unable to continue > [25497.124884] Rebooting in 3 seconds.. > > bugtracker updated.... i can get (reproduce) error on all 10 servers at > 2.6.26.5... I use TC and not wont test 2.6.27-rc because its have (if i > understand) multiqueue feature that not tested... Actually, it's quite well tested, especially by Denys, and I doubt it will be much better in 2.6.27. BTW, maybe start eth1, stop eth0 yet? Thanks, Jarek P.