From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, csnook@redhat.com, rick.jones2@hp.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:14:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080923001409.GB25711@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080922.162158.223213897.davem@davemloft.net>
> It is not an invalid estimate even in the NAT case,
Typical case: you got a large company network behind a NAT.
First user has a very crappy wireless connection behind a slow
intercontinental link talking to the outgoing NAT router. He connectes to
your internet server first and the window, slow start etc. parameters
for him are saved in the dst_entry.
The next guy behind the same NAT is in the same building
as the router who connects the company to the internet. He
has a much faster line. He connects to the same server.
They will share the same dst and inetpeer entries.
The parameters saved earlier for the same IP are clearly invalid
for the second case. The link characteristics are completely
different.
Also did you know there are there are whole countries behind
NAT. e.g. I was told that all of Saudi Arabia only comes from
a small handfull of IP addresses. It would surprise me if
all of KSA has the same link characteristics? @)
Ah I see there's a sysctl now to disable this. How about
setting it by default?
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-23 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-08 21:56 RFC: Nagle latency tuning Christopher Snook
2008-09-08 22:39 ` Rick Jones
2008-09-09 5:10 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-09 5:17 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 5:56 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-09 6:02 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 10:31 ` Mark Brown
2008-09-09 12:05 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 12:09 ` Mark Brown
2008-09-09 12:19 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 6:22 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-09 6:28 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-09 13:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-09-09 14:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-09 18:40 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-09 19:07 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-09 19:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-09-11 4:08 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-09 19:59 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 20:25 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-22 10:49 ` David Miller
2008-09-22 11:09 ` David Miller
2008-09-22 20:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-22 22:22 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-22 22:26 ` David Miller
2008-09-22 23:00 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-22 23:13 ` David Miller
2008-09-22 23:24 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-22 23:21 ` David Miller
2008-09-23 0:14 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-09-23 0:33 ` Rick Jones
2008-09-23 2:12 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-23 1:40 ` David Miller
2008-09-23 2:23 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-23 2:28 ` David Miller
2008-09-23 2:41 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-22 22:47 ` Rick Jones
2008-09-22 22:57 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-09 16:33 ` Rick Jones
2008-09-09 16:54 ` Chuck Lever
2008-09-09 17:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-09-09 17:54 ` Rick Jones
2008-09-08 22:55 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-09 5:22 ` Chris Snook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080923001409.GB25711@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).