From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: rick.jones2@hp.com, rdunlap@xenotime.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
jeff@garzik.org, linville@tuxdriver.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: patchwork for netdev
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:08:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080923010814.GD10472@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080918.191125.197691273.davem@davemloft.net>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 07:11:25PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:28:02 -0700
>
> > > I was hoping those ACK emails would be one of the things I could stop
> > > doing if patchwork is effective. Not immediately, but eventually.
> >
> > Can't patchwork do that as those clicks to change state take place?
>
> I honestly don't know, but my guess would be know.
>
> We could ask the patchwork author for this feature, as this
> stuff is actively maintained.
I think that the "thanks applied" feedback that occurs on netdev
is quite useful, as is the kind of automated feedback that
goes on from Andrew Morton's scripts in mm. To be honest I find
it quite frustrating when other maintainers in other arenas just
silently drop/ignore/apply-later (who knows which, or when?).
By all means I think that streamlining processes is good.
But if a change could be made to patchwork allow the "thanks applied"
feedback to continue, that would be doubly good.
--
Simon Horman
VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office
H: www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: www.valinux.co.jp/en
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-23 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-18 23:56 patchwork for netdev David Miller
2008-09-19 0:01 ` Randy.Dunlap
2008-09-19 0:05 ` David Miller
2008-09-19 0:09 ` Randy.Dunlap
2008-09-19 0:12 ` David Miller
2008-09-19 0:13 ` Randy.Dunlap
2008-09-19 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-19 0:28 ` Rick Jones
2008-09-19 2:11 ` David Miller
2008-09-23 1:08 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2008-09-23 2:44 ` David Miller
2008-09-23 8:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-23 10:44 ` Jeremy Kerr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080923010814.GD10472@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).