From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: Patch for tbench regression. Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:52:03 +0400 Message-ID: <20080929055203.GA3460@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <20080928211530.GA9341@2ka.mipt.ru> <20080929031244.GA22619@gondor.apana.org.au> <20080929053605.GA21663@2ka.mipt.ru> <20080929054052.GA23600@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter , Mel Gorman , David Miller , Lennert Buytenhek To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.80.65]:58418 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751167AbYI2Fxx (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:53:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080929054052.GA23600@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 01:40:52PM +0800, Herbert Xu (herbert@gondor.apana.org.au) wrote: > Are you using Xen FV or PV? What processor? Can I determine that within guest? I do not think so except by loking at cpu flags? $ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5345 @ 2.33GHz stepping : 11 cpu MHz : 2333.406 cache size : 4096 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat clflush dts mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss pbe syscall lm constant_tsc up pebs bts pni ds_cpl ssse3 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips : 4666.81 clflush size : 64 power management: Actually it is a bit strange, if full or paravirtualization affects how loopback network works, I thought it should only affect communication between domains? -- Evgeniy Polyakov