From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 03/16] Allow binding to non-local addresses if IP_TRANSPARENT is set Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 07:31:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20081001.073142.267502679.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20081001142431.4893.48078.stgit@este> <20081001142431.4893.89758.stgit@este> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: kaber@trash.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: hidden@sch.bme.hu Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50392 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751830AbYJAObx convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2008 10:31:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20081001142431.4893.89758.stgit@este> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: KOVACS Krisztian Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:24:31 +0200 > Setting IP_TRANSPARENT is not really useful without allowing non-loca= l > binds for the socket. To make user-space code simpler we allow these = binds > even if IP_TRANSPARENT is set but IP_FREEBIND is not. >=20 > Signed-off-by: T=F3th L=E1szl=F3 Attila Applied to net-next-2.6