From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Patrick Hardy <kaber@trash.net>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: almost identical frag hashing funcs combined
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:18:38 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081001011838.GB970@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810010146001.27688@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
Em Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 01:57:47AM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen escreveu:
>
> $ diff-funcs ip6qhashfn reassembly.c netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
> --- reassembly.c:ip6qhashfn()
> +++ netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c:ip6qhashfn()
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> -static unsigned int ip6qhashfn(__be32 id, struct in6_addr *saddr,
> - struct in6_addr *daddr)
> +static unsigned int ip6qhashfn(__be32 id, const struct in6_addr *saddr,
> + const struct in6_addr *daddr)
> {
> u32 a, b, c;
>
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
>
> a += JHASH_GOLDEN_RATIO;
> b += JHASH_GOLDEN_RATIO;
> - c += ip6_frags.rnd;
> + c += nf_frags.rnd;
> __jhash_mix(a, b, c);
>
> a += (__force u32)saddr->s6_addr32[3];
>
> And codiff xx.o.old xx.o.new:
>
> net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c:
> ip6qhashfn | -512
> nf_hashfn | +6
> nf_ct_frag6_gather | +36
> 3 functions changed, 42 bytes added, 512 bytes removed, diff: -470
> net/ipv6/reassembly.c:
> ip6qhashfn | -512
> ip6_hashfn | +7
> ipv6_frag_rcv | +89
> 3 functions changed, 96 bytes added, 512 bytes removed, diff: -416
>
> net/ipv6/reassembly.c:
> inet6_hash_frag | +510
> 1 function changed, 510 bytes added, diff: +510
>
> Total: -376
>
> Compile tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Good stuff, I wonder if you can spot possible candidades by sorting by
function size... Or perhaps by function signature... perhaps a new dwarf
that looks just at the parameter types, ordering by type name, and
reducing typedefs :-)
Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-01 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-30 22:57 [PATCH net-next] ipv6: almost identical frag hashing funcs combined Ilpo Järvinen
2008-10-01 1:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2008-10-01 9:54 ` David Miller
2008-10-01 11:02 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-10-01 14:18 ` Brian Haley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081001011838.GB970@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).