From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?R=E9mi?= Denis-Courmont" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Phonet: declare headers Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 10:54:52 +0300 Message-ID: <200810011054.52951.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> References: <1222272700-28232-3-git-send-email-remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> <20080930.025957.261573022.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: "ext David Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233]:44485 "EHLO mgw-mx06.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752993AbYJAHzY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2008 03:55:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080930.025957.261573022.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 30 September 2008 12:59:57 ext David Miller, you wrote: > From: Remi Denis-Courmont > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:11:40 +0300 > > > Signed-off-by: R=E9mi Denis-Courmont > > Applied. > > I took a look and noticed that if_phonet.h needs some top-level > ifdef multiple inclusion protection. Oops. Patch follows. While we're on if_phonet.h, I also wonder what the "right" place for=20 phonet_header_ops is... Currently in phonet.ko, any network device driv= er=20 link-depends on the socket stack :-( for two tiny little header_ops=20 callbacks. Is that OK? or should it go to core like the Ethernet ops, o= r be=20 inline'd? Regards, --=20 R=E9mi Denis-Courmont Maemo Software, Nokia Devices R&D