From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: Joe Nall <joe@nall.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 12/16] selinux: Set socket NetLabel based on connection endpoint
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:09:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810011109.25573.paul.moore@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7DC4373B-194C-43FC-B4FB-B867999CAE76@nall.com>
On Wednesday 01 October 2008 10:51:31 am Joe Nall wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2008, at 5:00 AM, James Morris wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Paul Moore wrote:
> >> /**
> >> + * cipso_v4_sock_delattr - Delete the CIPSO option from a socket
> >> + * @sk: the socket
> >> + *
> >> + * Description:
> >> + * Removes the CIPSO option from a socket, if present.
> >> + *
> >> + */
> >> +void cipso_v4_sock_delattr(struct sock *sk)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> >
> >
> > Btw, what kind of testing has this patch had?
>
> Paul generated a patch for us against 2.6.26-5 that we have on about
> 20 developer and test boxes with good results in MLS enforcing. We
> are adding IPSec between machines and static fallback labels to the
> test mix and will report any issues. We have a couple of 8 core
> machines I'll stress test on to look for SMP issues.
Thanks Joe, however, I think James was talking specifically about the
this patch, not the entire aggregate patchset, and the
cipso_v4_sock_delattr() function in particular as it is not likely to
be called often in normal use.
To answer that question, I was going to write a small little test
program that would connect/disconnect UDP sockets and do writes in
various states to ensure the wire traffic was labeled (or not)
correctly. However, I had a bit of luck and Casey ended up using this
function in Smack[1] in a manner that saw it in a relatively common
code path so it got a decent test; in fact it was Casey who pointed out
the bugs in the initial revision.
[1] The Smack bits are still a work in progress and not ready for 2.6.28
so they have been left out of this patchset, expect something in the
2.6.29 timeframe.
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-01 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-16 12:55 [RFC PATCH v6 00/16] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.28 Paul Moore
2008-09-16 12:55 ` [RFC PATCH v6 01/16] selinux: Cleanup the NetLabel glue code Paul Moore
2008-10-01 1:35 ` James Morris
2008-10-01 16:34 ` Paul Moore
2008-09-16 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v6 02/16] selinux: Correctly handle IPv4 packets on IPv6 sockets in all cases Paul Moore
2008-10-01 1:36 ` James Morris
2008-10-01 16:37 ` Paul Moore
2008-09-16 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v6 03/16] netlabel: Remove unneeded in-kernel API functions Paul Moore
2008-10-01 1:38 ` James Morris
2008-09-16 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v6 04/16] selinux: Better local/forward check in selinux_ip_postroute() Paul Moore
2008-10-01 1:43 ` James Morris
2008-10-01 16:41 ` Paul Moore
2008-09-16 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v6 05/16] selinux: Fix a problem in security_netlbl_sid_to_secattr() Paul Moore
2008-09-16 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v6 06/16] selinux: Fix missing calls to netlbl_skbuff_err() Paul Moore
2008-09-16 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v6 07/16] smack: " Paul Moore
2008-09-16 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v6 08/16] netlabel: Replace protocol/NetLabel linking with refrerence counts Paul Moore
2008-10-01 9:01 ` James Morris
2008-09-16 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v6 09/16] netlabel: Add a generic way to create ordered linked lists of network addrs Paul Moore
2008-10-01 9:09 ` James Morris
2008-09-16 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v6 10/16] netlabel: Add network address selectors to the NetLabel/LSM domain mapping Paul Moore
2008-10-01 9:14 ` James Morris
2008-09-16 12:57 ` [RFC PATCH v6 11/16] netlabel: Add functionality to set the security attributes of a packet Paul Moore
2008-10-01 9:55 ` James Morris
2008-10-01 16:51 ` Paul Moore
2008-09-16 12:57 ` [RFC PATCH v6 12/16] selinux: Set socket NetLabel based on connection endpoint Paul Moore
2008-10-01 10:00 ` James Morris
2008-10-01 14:51 ` Joe Nall
2008-10-01 15:09 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2008-09-16 12:57 ` [RFC PATCH v6 13/16] selinux: Cache NetLabel secattrs in the socket's security struct Paul Moore
2008-09-16 12:57 ` [RFC PATCH v6 14/16] netlabel: Changes to the NetLabel security attributes to allow LSMs to pass full contexts Paul Moore
2008-09-16 12:57 ` [RFC PATCH v6 15/16] cipso: Add support for native local labeling and fixup mapping names Paul Moore
2008-10-01 10:09 ` James Morris
2008-10-01 17:05 ` Paul Moore
2008-10-01 22:12 ` James Morris
2008-10-02 2:13 ` Paul Moore
2008-09-16 12:57 ` [RFC PATCH v6 16/16] netlabel: Add configuration support for local labeling Paul Moore
2008-10-01 10:13 ` James Morris
2008-10-01 16:54 ` Paul Moore
2008-09-16 13:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 00/16] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.28 Paul Moore
2008-09-17 4:01 ` Casey Schaufler
2008-10-01 1:34 ` James Morris
2008-10-01 16:24 ` Paul Moore
2008-10-01 22:14 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810011109.25573.paul.moore@hp.com \
--to=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=joe@nall.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).