From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/32] Swap over NFS - v19 Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:38:10 -0400 Message-ID: <20081003153810.5dd0a33e@bree.surriel.com> References: <20081002130504.927878499@chello.nl> <20081002124748.638c95ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, Daniel Lezcano , Pekka Enberg , Neil Brown , David Miller To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:36898 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752246AbYJCTkB (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:40:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20081002124748.638c95ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:47:48 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:05:04 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Let's get this ball rolling... > > I don't think we're really able to get any MM balls rolling until we > get all the split-LRU stuff landed. Is anyone testing it? Is it good? I've done some testing on it on my two test systems and have not found performance regressions against the mainline VM. As for stability, I think we have done enough testing to conclude that it is stable by now. -- All rights reversed.