From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: ax25 rose Re: kernel panic linux-2.6.27-rc7 Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 22:09:39 +0200 Message-ID: <20081004200939.GB15152@ami.dom.local> References: <20081002194845.GB2664@ami.dom.local> <20081003073418.GA5235@ff.dom.local> <20081003074351.GB5235@ff.dom.local> <1223145027.23358.20.camel@f6bvp-5> <20081004191114.GA15152@ami.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linux Netdev List , Ralf Baechle DL5RB , David Miller To: "Bernard, f6bvp" Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]:12187 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752104AbYJDUDj (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Oct 2008 16:03:39 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d3so816612nfc.21 for ; Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081004191114.GA15152@ami.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 09:11:14PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > BTW, I think there is an additional, not serious problem with freeing > unorphaned sockets by netrom (as seen in your debugging logs with non > zero in the 2-nd, and 6 in the 3-rd column). So, it would be nice to > check if my #4 patch could help for this. (You need then 2.6.27-rc > with patches #1(debugging), #3, #4 as signed in my previous message, > and of course above mentioned one reverted). BTW, could you please test it with and without the #4 (af_netrom) patch? Jarek P.