From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: ax25 rose Re: kernel panic linux-2.6.27-rc7 Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 22:33:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20081005203345.GA2526@ami.dom.local> References: <20081002194845.GB2664@ami.dom.local> <20081003073418.GA5235@ff.dom.local> <20081003074351.GB5235@ff.dom.local> <1223145027.23358.20.camel@f6bvp-5> <20081004191114.GA15152@ami.dom.local> <20081004200939.GB15152@ami.dom.local> <1223221212.18094.4.camel@f6bvp-5> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Linux Netdev List , Ralf Baechle DL5RB , David Miller To: "Bernard, f6bvp" Return-path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.24]:20301 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754104AbYJEUdj (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:33:39 -0400 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so752789eyi.37 for ; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 13:33:37 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1223221212.18094.4.camel@f6bvp-5> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 05:40:12PM +0200, Bernard, f6bvp wrote: > With kernel-2.6.27-rc7 and ypur patches including netrom one I observ= ed > three events via netconsole. > I think that they were triggered by NetRom activity I exercized on > purpose. > See attached documents. Bernard, do you mean exactly "With kernel-2.6.27-rc7 and ypur patches including netrom" or this all and David's patch reverted? Jarek P. >=20 > Le samedi 04 octobre 2008 ?? 22:09 +0200, Jarek Poplawski a =E9crit : > > On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 09:11:14PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > ... > > > BTW, I think there is an additional, not serious problem with fre= eing > > > unorphaned sockets by netrom (as seen in your debugging logs with= non > > > zero in the 2-nd, and 6 in the 3-rd column). So, it would be nice= to > > > check if my #4 patch could help for this. (You need then 2.6.27-r= c > > > with patches #1(debugging), #3, #4 as signed in my previous messa= ge, > > > and of course above mentioned one reverted). > >=20 > > BTW, could you please test it with and without the #4 (af_netrom) p= atch? > >=20 > > Jarek P. > >=20