From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings for the week of October 7th, 2008 Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 22:16:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20081007201617.GA20655@elte.hu> References: <48EBBE15.9030905@linux.intel.com> <200810072213.16103.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , NetDev , linux-acpi , tglx@tglx.de, Theodore Ts'o , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200810072213.16103.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org * Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Rank 9: device_pm_add (warning) > > Reported 81 times (323 total reports) > > Drivers with suspect suspend/resume logic; a patch is queued for 2.6.28 to identify > > which drivers are involved. > > This warning was last seen in version 2.6.27-rc4, and first seen in 2.6.26-rc5. > > More info: http://www.kerneloops.org/searchweek.php?search=device_pm_add > > This should have been fixed by: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f5a6d958b5d0a10e7e7a9dee1862fb31d08c6d26 hm, that is: | From f5a6d958b5d0a10e7e7a9dee1862fb31d08c6d26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | From: Rafael J. Wysocki | Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 01:05:13 +0200 | Subject: [PATCH] PM: Remove WARN_ON from device_pm_add | | PM: Remove WARN_ON from device_pm_add | | Fix message in device_pm_add() saying that the device will not be | added to dpm_list, although in fact the device is going to be added | to the list regardless of the ordering violation. | | Remove the WARN_ON(true) triggered in that situation, because it is | hit by USB very often and spams the users' logs. | | This patch fixes bug #11263 + if (dev->parent->power.status >= DPM_SUSPENDING) + dev_warn(dev, "parent %s should not be sleeping\n", dev->parent->bus_id); - WARN_ON(true); - } i.e. no bug was fixed in reality - we still emit a kernel log entry, but the WARN_ON() was removed, so that it does not fall under the scope of kerneloops.org, right? Ingo