From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: Possible regression in HTB Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:53:46 +0000 Message-ID: <20081008075346.GD4174@ff.dom.local> References: <20081007011551.GA28408@verge.net.au> <20081007045145.GA23883@verge.net.au> <20081007074435.GA2700@ff.dom.local> <20081008000928.GJ12021@verge.net.au> <20081008063701.GA4174@ff.dom.local> <20081008072243.GK22396@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller To: Simon Horman Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:29998 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751210AbYJHHxv (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2008 03:53:51 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id k3so488577ugf.37 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081008072243.GK22396@verge.net.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:22:44PM +1100, Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:37:01AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 11:09:28AM +1100, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 07:44:35AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > ... > > > > So, thanks for testing and reporting this. (BTW, what network card > > > > do you use and is there multiqueuing on?) > > > > > > The network card is an e1000. Acutally there are two, but I ... > > I've only wandered if we should consider any new effects because of > > this, but e1000/1000e don't have this yet (bnx2 has). ... > Ok, what should I be checking for? I think, it's all with this... We simply know multiquing doesn't matter here. Jarek P.