From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings for the week of October 7th, 2008 Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:06:54 +0200 Message-ID: <200810081106.55730.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <48EBBE15.9030905@linux.intel.com> <20081007235833.1a89948f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20081007.160835.257227518.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, arjan@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, tglx@tglx.de, tytso@mit.edu, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081007.160835.257227518.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, 8 of October 2008, David Miller wrote: > From: Alan Cox > Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 23:58:33 +0100 > > > > This should have been fixed by: > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f5a6d958b5d0a10e7e7a9dee1862fb31d08c6d26 > > > > You mean - hidden by - that change should IMHO be reverted > > Grrr... I totally agree. Even though they are false positives in many cases? (Yes, they are).