From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen. Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:57:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20081010115725.GD19487@elte.hu> References: <20081009231759.GA8664@tservice.net.ru> <20081010080910.GA31723@tservice.net.ru> <20081010091511.GC5116@elte.hu> <20081010113100.GA1030@tservice.net.ru> <20081010114245.GB19487@elte.hu> <20081010115518.GA3159@tservice.net.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , Mike Galbraith To: Evgeniy Polyakov Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081010115518.GA3159@tservice.net.ru> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org * Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 01:42:45PM +0200, Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote: > > > vanilla 27: 347.222 > > > no TSO/GSO: 357.331 > > > no hrticks: 382.983 > > > no balance: 389.802 > > > > okay. The target is 470 MB/sec, right? (Assuming the workload is sane > > and 'fixing' it does not mean we have to schedule worse.) > > Well, that's where I started/stopped, so maybe we will even move > further? :) that's the right attitude ;) Ingo