netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] PCI: vpd handle longer delays in access
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:13:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081013201452.642628937@vyatta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20081013201302.899587376@vyatta.com

[-- Attachment #1: vpd-delay.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4235 bytes --]

Accessing the VPD area can take a long time.  The existing 
VPD access code fails consistently on my hardware. There are comments
in the SysKonnect vendor driver that it can take up to 13ms per word. 

Change the access routines to:
  * use a mutex rather than spinning with IRQ's disabled and lock held
  * have a much longer timeout
  * call cond_resched while spinning

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>


---
 drivers/pci/access.c |   55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pci/access.c	2008-10-13 12:46:17.000000000 -0700
+++ b/drivers/pci/access.c	2008-10-13 13:03:50.000000000 -0700
@@ -133,39 +133,46 @@ PCI_USER_WRITE_CONFIG(dword, u32)
 
 struct pci_vpd_pci22 {
 	struct pci_vpd base;
-	spinlock_t lock; /* controls access to hardware and the flags */
-	u8	cap;
+	struct mutex lock;
+	u16	flag;
 	bool	busy;
-	bool	flag; /* value of F bit to wait for */
+	u8	cap;
 };
 
-/* Wait for last operation to complete */
+/*
+ * Wait for last operation to complete.
+ * This code has to spin since there is no other notification from the PCI
+ * hardware. Since the VPD is often implemented by serial attachment to an
+ * EEPROM, it may take many milliseconds to complete.
+ */
 static int pci_vpd_pci22_wait(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	struct pci_vpd_pci22 *vpd =
 		container_of(dev->vpd, struct pci_vpd_pci22, base);
-	u16 flag, status;
-	int wait;
+	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ/20 + 2;
+	u16 status;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!vpd->busy)
 		return 0;
 
-	flag = vpd->flag ? PCI_VPD_ADDR_F : 0;
-	wait = vpd->flag ? 10 : 1000; /* read: 100 us; write: 10 ms */
 	for (;;) {
-		ret = pci_user_read_config_word(dev,
-						vpd->cap + PCI_VPD_ADDR,
+		ret = pci_user_read_config_word(dev, vpd->cap + PCI_VPD_ADDR,
 						&status);
-		if (ret < 0)
+		if (ret)
 			return ret;
-		if ((status & PCI_VPD_ADDR_F) == flag) {
+
+		if ((status & PCI_VPD_ADDR_F) == vpd->flag) {
 			vpd->busy = false;
 			return 0;
 		}
-		if (wait-- == 0)
+
+		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
 			return -ETIMEDOUT;
-		udelay(10);
+		if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
+			return -EINTR;
+		if (!cond_resched())
+			udelay(10);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -175,7 +182,7 @@ static int pci_vpd_pci22_read(struct pci
 	struct pci_vpd_pci22 *vpd =
 		container_of(dev->vpd, struct pci_vpd_pci22, base);
 	u32 val;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 	int begin, end, i;
 
 	if (pos < 0 || pos > vpd->base.len || size > vpd->base.len  - pos)
@@ -183,7 +190,9 @@ static int pci_vpd_pci22_read(struct pci
 	if (size == 0)
 		return 0;
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&vpd->lock);
+	if (mutex_lock_killable(&vpd->lock))
+		return -EINTR;
+
 	ret = pci_vpd_pci22_wait(dev);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
@@ -191,15 +200,16 @@ static int pci_vpd_pci22_read(struct pci
 					 pos & ~3);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
+
 	vpd->busy = true;
-	vpd->flag = 1;
+	vpd->flag = PCI_VPD_ADDR_F;
 	ret = pci_vpd_pci22_wait(dev);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 	ret = pci_user_read_config_dword(dev, vpd->cap + PCI_VPD_DATA,
 					 &val);
 out:
-	spin_unlock_irq(&vpd->lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&vpd->lock);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -220,7 +230,7 @@ static int pci_vpd_pci22_write(struct pc
 	struct pci_vpd_pci22 *vpd =
 		container_of(dev->vpd, struct pci_vpd_pci22, base);
 	u32 val;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (pos < 0 || pos > vpd->base.len || pos & 3 ||
 	    size > vpd->base.len - pos || size < 4)
@@ -231,7 +241,8 @@ static int pci_vpd_pci22_write(struct pc
 	val |= ((u8) *buf++) << 16;
 	val |= ((u32)(u8) *buf++) << 24;
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&vpd->lock);
+	if (mutex_lock_killable(&vpd->lock))
+		return -EINTR;
 	ret = pci_vpd_pci22_wait(dev);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
@@ -247,7 +258,7 @@ static int pci_vpd_pci22_write(struct pc
 	vpd->flag = 0;
 	ret = pci_vpd_pci22_wait(dev);
 out:
-	spin_unlock_irq(&vpd->lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&vpd->lock);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -279,7 +290,7 @@ int pci_vpd_pci22_init(struct pci_dev *d
 
 	vpd->base.len = PCI_VPD_PCI22_SIZE;
 	vpd->base.ops = &pci_vpd_pci22_ops;
-	spin_lock_init(&vpd->lock);
+	mutex_init(&vpd->lock);
 	vpd->cap = cap;
 	vpd->busy = false;
 	dev->vpd = &vpd->base;

-- 


  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-13 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-13 20:13 [PATCH 0/9] Vital Product Data (VPD) patches relating to skge/sky2 Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-13 20:13 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2008-10-13 20:13 ` [PATCH 2/9] PCI: revise VPD access interface Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-13 20:13 ` [PATCH 3/9] PCI: add interface to set visible size of VPD (rev3) Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-13 20:13 ` [PATCH 4/9] sky2: set VPD size Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-13 20:13 ` [PATCH 5/9] sky2: move VPD display into debug interface Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-13 20:13 ` [PATCH 6/9] sky2: remove eeprom interface Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-13 20:13 ` [PATCH 7/9] skge: set VPD size Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-13 20:13 ` [PATCH 8/9] skge: add VPD display into debug interface Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-13 20:13 ` [PATCH 9/9] skge: remove ethtool eeprom interface Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081013201452.642628937@vyatta.com \
    --to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).