From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: tcp_sack problem Re: [Bug 11721] after upgrade to 2.6.27 i cannot navigate Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:51:18 +0000 Message-ID: <20081020095118.GB6203@ff.dom.local> References: <20081018202056.F1933108040@picon.linux-foundation.org> <20081018210252.GA6048@ami.dom.local> <20081018215007.GB6048@ami.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Aldo Maggi , Netdev , bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= Return-path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.27]:57432 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751114AbYJTJvZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 05:51:25 -0400 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so532678eyi.37 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:38:51PM +0300, Ilpo J=E4rvinen wrote: =2E.. > ...Might be something crazy in the way that is too picky on tcp optio= n=20 > ordering which wouldn't surprise me that much... :-) Please try if > the patch below does any difference (on paperino is enough, the gw se= ems=20 > innocent here). I've just thought about this too(!), and it seems that turning of tcp_timestamps should do similar reorder. But of course, I'll try not to disturb anymore... Thanks, Jarek P.