From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jarkao2@gmail.com
Cc: kaber@trash.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, shemminger@vyatta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: sch_netem: Limit packet re-ordering functionality to tfifo qdisc.
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:36:05 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081021.163605.57275028.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081017201210.GA2527@ami.dom.local>
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:12:10 +0200
> pkt_sched: sch_netem: Limit packet re-ordering functionality to tfifo qdisc.
>
> After introducing qdisc->ops->peek() method the only remaining user of
> qdisc->ops->requeue() is netem_enqueue() using this for packet
> re-ordering. According to Patrick McHardy: "a lot of the functionality
> of netem requires the inner tfifo anyways and rate-limiting is usually
> done on top of netem. So I would suggest so either hard-wire the tfifo
> qdisc or at least make the assumption that inner qdiscs are work-
> conserving." This patch tries the former.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
This is an interesting patch.
But the thing that strikes me is this: Why don't we just let sch_netem do
the reordering inside of itself entirely and just get rid of all of this
->requeue() business?
sch_netem is just a black box, like any other packet scheduler node in
the tree, and so it can internally do the reordering with a self managed
packet list or similar. All of this can be hidden inside of it's ->dequeue()
with some pkt_sch watchdog timer that fires to prevent stale packets sitting
in the reorder queue forever.
Anyways, just and idea and RFC, just like this patch ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-21 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-16 9:46 [PATCH 0/6] Add qdisc->ops->peek() support Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-16 12:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-16 13:08 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-16 22:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-17 12:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-17 13:03 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-17 14:12 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-17 20:12 ` [PATCH] pkt_sched: sch_netem: Limit packet re-ordering functionality to tfifo qdisc Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-21 23:36 ` David Miller [this message]
2008-10-21 23:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-22 5:37 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-22 16:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-22 16:49 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-22 17:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-22 17:53 ` [RFC] " Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-22 15:57 ` [PATCH] " Patrick McHardy
2008-10-22 16:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-17 20:45 ` [PATCH 0/6] Add qdisc->ops->peek() support Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-21 23:43 ` David Miller
2008-10-22 16:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-22 16:04 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081021.163605.57275028.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).