From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: two other cases Re: [Bug 11721] after upgrade to 2.6.27 i
	cannot navigate
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:29:23 +0200
Message-ID: <20081021162922.GA2549@ami.dom.local>
References: <20081021090002.21e64151@topolino> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810211200170.7072@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi> <20081021100923.GD4715@ff.dom.local> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810211333290.7072@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi> <20081021111227.GE4715@ff.dom.local> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810211423350.7072@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi> <20081021123414.GF4715@ff.dom.local> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810211546270.7072@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: Aldo Maggi <sentiniate@tiscali.it>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]:14238 "EHLO
	nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751914AbYJUQ3U (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:29:20 -0400
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d3so1214354nfc.21
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810211546270.7072@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:16:43PM +0300, Ilpo J=E4rvinen wrote:
=2E..
> We're dealing with a case with in itself is really funny, yes, I assu=
me=20
> it's very much possible though not too likely :-). I'd have very much=
=20
> wanted to test it myself too but sadly my network does not exhibit th=
is=20
> corner-case behavior (ie., bug). Whether I'm right or wrong is not th=
at=20
> significant for me :-), just understanding what the black-box does (o=
r
> is fine with) instead of just knowing how to workaround that. Or did =
I=20
> miss another case where the significance of mss specifically being th=
ere=20
> was decided? :-)
>=20
> But whatever, if Aldo feels it's waste of his time he can just ignore=
=20
> me... :-)

Hmm... If by any chance my previous messages caused you think like
this, I'm really sorry. I completely agree with the way you deal with
this, and I don't pretend I know the result. I still agree there seems
to be not much logic in this, so all results are probable, and worth
checking - especially when we have such helpful assistant as Aldo.

Thanks,
Jarek P.