netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	kaber@trash.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: sch_netem: Limit packet re-ordering functionality to tfifo qdisc.
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:37:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081022053746.GA4178@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081021165129.422dd83f@extreme>

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 04:51:29PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> 
> > From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:12:10 +0200
> > 
> > > pkt_sched: sch_netem: Limit packet re-ordering functionality to tfifo qdisc.
> > > 
> > > After introducing qdisc->ops->peek() method the only remaining user of
> > > qdisc->ops->requeue() is netem_enqueue() using this for packet
> > > re-ordering. According to Patrick McHardy: "a lot of the functionality
> > > of netem requires the inner tfifo anyways and rate-limiting is usually
> > > done on top of netem. So I would suggest so either hard-wire the tfifo
> > > qdisc or at least make the assumption that inner qdiscs are work-
> > > conserving." This patch tries the former.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
> > 
> > This is an interesting patch.
> > 
> > But the thing that strikes me is this: Why don't we just let sch_netem do
> > the reordering inside of itself entirely and just get rid of all of this
> > ->requeue() business?

We just let for this here with sch_netem's default tfifo qdisc.

> > 
> > sch_netem is just a black box, like any other packet scheduler node in
> > the tree, and so it can internally do the reordering with a self managed
> > packet list or similar.  All of this can be hidden inside of it's ->dequeue()
> > with some pkt_sch watchdog timer that fires to prevent stale packets sitting
> > in the reorder queue forever.
> > 
> > Anyways, just and idea and RFC, just like this patch ;-)
> 
> The problem is that jamal talked me into having netem as a classful qdisc,
> instead of doing its own rate control.  People like to do use TBF as inner qdisc,
> and do reordering.

If it's only this kind of usage we could export tfifo and let use this
as a TBF's (etc.) leaf. Of course, this would require changes in those
people scripts.

Jarek P.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-22  5:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-16  9:46 [PATCH 0/6] Add qdisc->ops->peek() support Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-16 12:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-16 13:08   ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-16 22:09   ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-17 12:33     ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-17 13:03       ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-17 14:12         ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-17 20:12           ` [PATCH] pkt_sched: sch_netem: Limit packet re-ordering functionality to tfifo qdisc Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-21 23:36             ` David Miller
2008-10-21 23:51               ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-22  5:37                 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2008-10-22 16:00                   ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-22 16:49                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-22 17:32                       ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-22 17:53                         ` [RFC] " Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-22 15:57               ` [PATCH] " Patrick McHardy
2008-10-22 16:00               ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-17 20:45           ` [PATCH 0/6] Add qdisc->ops->peek() support Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-21 23:43             ` David Miller
2008-10-22 16:01               ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-22 16:04             ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081022053746.GA4178@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).