From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [RFC] pkt_sched: sch_netem: Limit packet re-ordering functionality to tfifo qdisc. Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:53:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20081022175321.GA2710@ami.dom.local> References: <20081017130333.GA8297@ff.dom.local> <48F89D33.9090809@trash.net> <20081017201210.GA2527@ami.dom.local> <20081021.163605.57275028.davem@davemloft.net> <20081021165129.422dd83f@extreme> <20081022053746.GA4178@ff.dom.local> <48FF4E38.9010806@trash.net> <20081022164925.GB2556@ami.dom.local> <48FF6392.5000305@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Stephen Hemminger , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.26]:6202 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760791AbYJVRwn (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:52:43 -0400 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so1023686eyi.37 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:52:41 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48FF6392.5000305@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 07:32:02PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: ... > Well, you're doing the work, so you decide. I'm undecided myself, > the main issues I see are: Well, I've only tried to finish David's "Killing qdisc->ops->requeue()", which I had broken before. Then somebody framed me into this ->peek() /netem thing... ... > So actually I am decided :) I think netem shouldn't be classful. OK, I added RFC to the subject. Jarek P.