From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen. Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20081024.221653.23695396.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20081010115725.GD19487@elte.hu> <200810250025.35734.rjw@sisk.pl> <1224905848.5161.27.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, mingo@elte.hu, s0mbre@tservice.net.ru, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: efault@gmx.de Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56081 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750798AbYJYFRP (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:17:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1224905848.5161.27.camel@marge.simson.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Mike Galbraith Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 05:37:28 +0200 > Part of the .27 regression was added scheduler overhead going from .26 > to .27. The scheduler overhead is now gone, but an unidentified source > of localhost throughput loss remains for both SMP and UP configs. It has to be the TSO thinky Evgeniy hit too right? If not, please bisect this.