From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen. Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:25:34 +0200 Message-ID: <200810250025.35734.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20081009231759.GA8664@tservice.net.ru> <20081010115518.GA3159@tservice.net.ru> <20081010115725.GD19487@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , Mike Galbraith To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:48334 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756622AbYJXWVP (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:21:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20081010115725.GD19487@elte.hu> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Friday, 10 of October 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 01:42:45PM +0200, Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote: > > > > vanilla 27: 347.222 > > > > no TSO/GSO: 357.331 > > > > no hrticks: 382.983 > > > > no balance: 389.802 > > > > > > okay. The target is 470 MB/sec, right? (Assuming the workload is sane > > > and 'fixing' it does not mean we have to schedule worse.) > > > > Well, that's where I started/stopped, so maybe we will even move > > further? :) > > that's the right attitude ;) Can anyone please tell me if there was any conclusion of this thread? Thanks, Rafael