From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael B. Trausch" Subject: Re: NULL pointer derefence since 2.6.27 in (e)poll Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:03:43 -0400 Message-ID: <20081025200343.08dc7999@zest> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/wxqRVD.dYcTx9N7UiOtEd9f"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-RIPEMD160 To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.31]:55241 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751833AbYJZADx (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:03:53 -0400 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so433998ywe.1 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 17:03:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --Sig_/wxqRVD.dYcTx9N7UiOtEd9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:48:00 UTC Hugh Dickins wrote: >=20 > Isn't it the issue fixed by >=20 > http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D122428548613067&w=3D2 >=20 Is there a reason that this patch has not yet been applied to the Linux kernel? I just found this thread and had to apply this patch to 2.6.28-rc1. Shouldn't it go into 2.6.28? --- Mike --=20 My sigfile ran away and is on hiatus. http://www.trausch.us/ --Sig_/wxqRVD.dYcTx9N7UiOtEd9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAkkDs98ACgkQ0kE/IBnFmjBetgCcCLASeDvV2mOkhOWxhKLSn8N6 b3wAniAJjQKVHQ/XZAOcZBQ7bcCIWc40 =pt6b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/wxqRVD.dYcTx9N7UiOtEd9f--