From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: don't use INIT_RCU_HEAD
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:10:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081028161017.GF6779@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081028133124.GA3006@x200.localdomain>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 04:31:24PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> call_rcu() will unconditionally rewrite RCU head anyway.
> Applies to
> struct neigh_parms
> struct neigh_table
> struct net
> struct cipso_v4_doi
> struct in_ifaddr
> struct in_device
> rt->u.dst
Assuming that no code outside of RCU is testing the rcu_head fields...
That would usually be a bad idea in any case, as call_rcu() makes no
guarantee about the values of these fields after the callback is invoked.
Furthermore, there have been serious proposals that would change the
call_rcu() field names and layout.
Therefore:
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> net/core/neighbour.c | 2 --
> net/core/net_namespace.c | 2 --
> net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c | 1 -
> net/ipv4/devinet.c | 9 +--------
> net/ipv4/route.c | 1 -
> 5 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/net/core/neighbour.c
> +++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
> @@ -1340,7 +1340,6 @@ struct neigh_parms *neigh_parms_alloc(struct net_device *dev,
> if (p) {
> p->tbl = tbl;
> atomic_set(&p->refcnt, 1);
> - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&p->rcu_head);
> p->reachable_time =
> neigh_rand_reach_time(p->base_reachable_time);
>
> @@ -1412,7 +1411,6 @@ void neigh_table_init_no_netlink(struct neigh_table *tbl)
> tbl->parms.net = &init_net;
> #endif
> atomic_set(&tbl->parms.refcnt, 1);
> - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&tbl->parms.rcu_head);
> tbl->parms.reachable_time =
> neigh_rand_reach_time(tbl->parms.base_reachable_time);
>
> --- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
> +++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ static __net_init int setup_net(struct net *net)
> goto out;
>
> ng->len = INITIAL_NET_GEN_PTRS;
> - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&ng->rcu);
> rcu_assign_pointer(net->gen, ng);
>
> error = 0;
> @@ -446,7 +445,6 @@ int net_assign_generic(struct net *net, int id, void *data)
> */
>
> ng->len = id;
> - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&ng->rcu);
> memcpy(&ng->ptr, &old_ng->ptr, old_ng->len);
>
> rcu_assign_pointer(net->gen, ng);
> --- a/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c
> @@ -490,7 +490,6 @@ int cipso_v4_doi_add(struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def)
> }
>
> atomic_set(&doi_def->refcount, 1);
> - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&doi_def->rcu);
>
> spin_lock(&cipso_v4_doi_list_lock);
> if (cipso_v4_doi_search(doi_def->doi) != NULL)
> --- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
> @@ -112,13 +112,7 @@ static inline void devinet_sysctl_unregister(struct in_device *idev)
>
> static struct in_ifaddr *inet_alloc_ifa(void)
> {
> - struct in_ifaddr *ifa = kzalloc(sizeof(*ifa), GFP_KERNEL);
> -
> - if (ifa) {
> - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&ifa->rcu_head);
> - }
> -
> - return ifa;
> + return kzalloc(sizeof(struct in_ifaddr), GFP_KERNEL);
> }
>
> static void inet_rcu_free_ifa(struct rcu_head *head)
> @@ -161,7 +155,6 @@ static struct in_device *inetdev_init(struct net_device *dev)
> in_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*in_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!in_dev)
> goto out;
> - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&in_dev->rcu_head);
> memcpy(&in_dev->cnf, dev_net(dev)->ipv4.devconf_dflt,
> sizeof(in_dev->cnf));
> in_dev->cnf.sysctl = NULL;
> --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
> @@ -1386,7 +1386,6 @@ void ip_rt_redirect(__be32 old_gw, __be32 daddr, __be32 new_gw,
>
> /* Copy all the information. */
> *rt = *rth;
> - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&rt->u.dst.rcu_head);
> rt->u.dst.__use = 1;
> atomic_set(&rt->u.dst.__refcnt, 1);
> rt->u.dst.child = NULL;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-28 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-28 13:31 [PATCH] net: don't use INIT_RCU_HEAD Alexey Dobriyan
2008-10-28 15:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-28 15:43 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-10-28 16:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-28 16:10 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2008-10-28 20:25 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081028161017.GF6779@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).