From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore Subject: Re: linux-next: arm allmodconfig Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:53:02 -0400 Message-ID: <200810290953.03105.paul.moore@hp.com> References: <20081028175604.81c31cea.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Dave Airlie , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, Herbert Xu , Takashi Iwai , Pekka Enberg , xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.44]:28828 "EHLO g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753373AbYJ2NxK (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:53:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20081028175604.81c31cea.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 28 October 2008 8:56:04 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > > net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c: In function `netlbl_mgmt_listentry': > > net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c:268: warning: 'ret_val' might be used > > uninitialized in this function > > Assumes that netlbl_af4list_foreach_rcu() will never iterate zero > times. > > Assumes that entry->type can never have an unexpected value. > > gcc cannot get this right, and C-level changes will be needed to shut > this up. No idea why this didn't come up when I was compiling this ... oh well, good thing I'm not a proud guy :) I'll get this fixed and post a patch later today. Thanks. -- paul moore linux @ hp