From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] udp: Introduce special NULL pointers for hlist termination Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20081031.005131.158229955.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4909D551.9080309@cosmosbay.com> <20081030085126.0d9b956b@extreme> <4909EAE3.9060002@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, minyard@acm.org, benny+usenet@amorsen.dk, netdev@vger.kernel.org, cl@linux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, christian@myri.com To: dada1@cosmosbay.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:38776 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752311AbYJaHv5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:51:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4909EAE3.9060002@cosmosbay.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:12:03 +0100 > More seriously Stephen, if the infrastructure is clean, and well > tested on a relative simple case (UDP), it can then be deployed on a > much more interesting protocol : TCP I'm really looking forward to someone finally tackling that problem :) > The moment we switch to RCU, we have to accept the pain of really > understand what we did. Details are scary yes. Agreed.