From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jeff@garzik.org
Cc: andy@greyhouse.net, mcarlson@broadcom.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, mchan@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: zeroing dev->irq
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:28:20 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081103.192820.125970076.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <490B36B6.2020300@garzik.org>
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:47:50 -0400
> Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > This came up because the output is currently wrong.
> > # ifconfig eth0 | grep Inter && grep eth0 /proc/interrupts
> > Interrupt:169 Memory:f6000000-f6012100
> > 122: 2894 0 0 PCI-MSI eth0
> > Some drivers take the stand of not setting dev->irq anything (like most
> > of the Intel drivers), but I didn't take that route with tg3 (or with
> > the others I'd planned) simply because I didn't want to hear crying
> > about breaking user-space with a patch that would make that line
> > disappear.
> > If this seems like a reasonable change that we can force on user-space
> > I'll post a patch that drops the setting of dev->irq all together, so
> > this disappers.
>
> I would vote for zeroing dev->irq in not only tg3, but also other
> modern, ethtool-enabled drivers... It is a relic of the ISA days,
> and is incompatible with multiple MSI vector scenarios, something
> also found on some non-x86 and embedded ethernet drivers.
>
> For years now, dev->irq has been providing information on an
> unreliable, best-effort basis. I prefer definitive, reliable,
> predictable behaviors, and think always-zero is therefore an
> improvement.
>
> Comments welcome...
I completely agree with Jeff and I'll happily take patches
which do this into net-next-2.6
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-04 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-31 15:54 [PATCH net-next] tg3: inconsistent interrupt value reported Andy Gospodarek
2008-10-31 16:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-10-31 16:38 ` Andy Gospodarek
2008-10-31 16:47 ` zeroing dev->irq (was Re: [PATCH net-next] tg3: inconsistent interrupt value reported) Jeff Garzik
2008-11-04 3:28 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081103.192820.125970076.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).